Animal Sacrifices allowed or not ?

In both Mahabharatha and Bhagavatham , and in some other sastras like Manudharma, there are discussions on animal Sacrifice and meat eating

All these scriptures agree on one point viz., " Killing animals  is not a sin in sacrifice. Otherwise a great sin."

 But still, we can find some statements against even animal Sacrifices which is not considered as sin.

 The question that arises here is that if animal Sacrifices are sanctioned by scriptures, then why there are conflicting statements which oppose animal Sacrifices ?

 

statements which sanction animal Sacrifices 

 https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07064.htm

 Of rigid vows and always engaged in due performance of sacrifices, countless animals, desirous of going to heaven, used to come to him of their own accord. 2 So large was the number of animals sacrificed in the Agnihotra of that king that the secretions flowing from his kitchen from the heaps of skins deposited there caused a veritable river which from this circumstance, came to be called the Charmanwati.

https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07064.htm

The sacred fire is fond of animal food,' this saying has come down to us. And at sacrifices animals are invariably killed by regenerate Brahmanas, and these animals being purged of sin, by incantation of hymns, go to heaven. If, O Brahmana, the sacred fire had not been so fond of animal food in ancient times, it could never have become the food of any one

ŚB 6.4.9,  ŚB 10.69.35,  ŚB 10.58.15-16

 

 https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01229.htm

    "Then those foremost of car-warriors (Krishna and Arjuna), riding in their cars and placing themselves on opposite sides of that forest, began a great slaughter, on all sides, of the creatures dwelling in Khandava"

    "The birds that took wings to escape from that conflagration were pierced by Arjuna with his shafts, and cut into pieces, they fell down into the burning element below. Pierced all over with Arjuna's shafts, the birds dropped down into the burning forest, uttering loud cries."

 https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-mahabharata-mohan/d/doc826441.html

The audition is heard that animals were created for sacrifice. They who eat flesh in any other way are said to follow the Rakshasa practice.

 Bhishma said, Listen to me as I tell you what the ordinance is that has been laid down for the Kshatriyas. They do not incur any fault by eating flesh that has been acquired by expenditure of prowess. All deer of the wilderness were dedicated to the deities and the Pitris in days of old, O king, by Agastya. Hence, the hunting of deer is not censured.

 

statements which oppose animal Sacrifices

 https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12b092.htm

 Wine, fish, honey, meat, alcohol, and preparations of rice and sesame seeds, have been introduced by knaves. The use of these (in sacrifices) is not laid down in the Vedas. The hankering after these arises from pride, error of judgment, and cupidity. They that are true Brahmanas realise the presence of Vishnu in every sacrifice. His worship, it has been laid down, should be made with agreeable Payasa.

https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12c037.htm

The Rishis said, The opinion entertained by us, O king, is that sacrifices should be performed with grain. The deities, however, maintain that sacrifices should be performed with animals. Do thou judge between us and tell us which of these opinions is correct.'

"Bhishma continued, 'Learning what the opinion was that was entertained by the deities, Vasu, moved by partiality for them, said that sacrifices should be performed with animals. At this answer, all the Rishis, endued with the splendour of the Sun, became very angry. Addressing Vasu who was seated on his car and who had (wrongly) taken up the side of the deities, they said unto him,--Since thou hast (wrongly) taken up the side of the deities, do thou fall down from heaven.

And those hardcore hindutwa vadis who argue that vedas or scriptures didn't sanction  meateating . They argue that verses were mistranslated.

They also say that some britishers polluted and twisted the scriptures with interpolations and mistranslations.

 

Note : Only persons with good knowledge of scriptures are welcome. Quoating with references is appreciated.

 This question is not for brainwashers who do not show any references.

 

Thank you

 

 

You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!

Join ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT

Email me when people reply –

Replies

          •  

             

             Then he should have gone to muslim countries. Did he ?

                No, he couldn't as he was old by then. The muslims didn't come to argue with him like the Christians who argued and they got converted.

                 Sri Chaitnaya Mahaprabhu argued with a Muslim by named Chand Kazi.

            https://iskcondesiretree.com/profiles/blogs/dialogue-between-chaita...

            you must check.

            Lord Chaitanaya converted a muslim by just showing him Narsingh avatara in dreams.

            I will hope someday the Lord will create terror again in the hearts of the terrorists and  make them convert them back to Krishna consciousness when time comes.

            Demons need Demon slayer not simple devotees.

            Let us wait

            Someday Lord will Descend.

            Lets glorify Sri Krishna or Sri Hari and request Him to descend.

            Hare Krishna

            Dialogue between Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and Chand Kazi on Cow Killing
            Hare Krsna Please accept my humble obeisance. All glories to Srila Prabhupada   By His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada Lord Caitan…
            • https://iskcondesiretree.com/profiles/blogs/lord-chaitanya-mahaprab...

               

              Lord Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and the Muslim Chand Kazi
              Lord Chaitanya Mahaprabhu appeared in the late fifteenth century, 1486. He took birth in Bengal, India, which at the time was being governed by the P…
              • Who is more dangerous to the world ? 

                Did mayavadis murder anyone ? Did mayavadis destroy temples ? Did mayavadis murder cows ?

                Muslims also don't believe a form of god. That's why they hate dieties worship. Muslims destroyed temples.They Hate Krishna

                Muslims are cow murderers.

                 Now, plz tell whom you should be hard upon ? Instead he is very soft speaking about Muslims  as if they are his relatives and bullying mayavadis who are indians.

                It is but natural for any indian to get angry with him. Especially indians just hate this behaviour. Doesn't matter even if he is saint.

                 He should have suggested indian govt. to kickout all muslims outof the country. How can any indian coexist with cowmurderer ?

                • THE MAYAVAADI ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN MUSLIMS.

                  OUR OWN Hindus are not supporting the Personal feature of Lord then what to expect from a religion who is coming from other countries.

                  WE MUST SET RIGHT FIRST OUR OWN INDIANS ( HINDUS) first.

                  Ghar ke Bhedhi Lanka dhaaye.

                  Pehle apne ghar ke logon ko seedha karenge.

              • https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DH82R2fzaBo

      • Sevak

        Hare Krsna

        Your hatred, poison and malice are not required here. Offenders of Srila Prabhupada are not allowed here,

        Please go away and.never return

        Hare Krsna

        • Why are you crying 10 times ?

          I came to listen to some honest people like Gayatri ji, not you.

           

          • Sevak

            I thought you were leaving. 

          • yeah sure you like to listen to honesty but stay deluded by your obstinacy..

This reply was deleted.