Animal Sacrifices allowed or not ?

In both Mahabharatha and Bhagavatham , and in some other sastras like Manudharma, there are discussions on animal Sacrifice and meat eating

All these scriptures agree on one point viz., " Killing animals  is not a sin in sacrifice. Otherwise a great sin."

 But still, we can find some statements against even animal Sacrifices which is not considered as sin.

 The question that arises here is that if animal Sacrifices are sanctioned by scriptures, then why there are conflicting statements which oppose animal Sacrifices ?

 

statements which sanction animal Sacrifices 

 https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07064.htm

 Of rigid vows and always engaged in due performance of sacrifices, countless animals, desirous of going to heaven, used to come to him of their own accord. 2 So large was the number of animals sacrificed in the Agnihotra of that king that the secretions flowing from his kitchen from the heaps of skins deposited there caused a veritable river which from this circumstance, came to be called the Charmanwati.

https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07064.htm

The sacred fire is fond of animal food,' this saying has come down to us. And at sacrifices animals are invariably killed by regenerate Brahmanas, and these animals being purged of sin, by incantation of hymns, go to heaven. If, O Brahmana, the sacred fire had not been so fond of animal food in ancient times, it could never have become the food of any one

ŚB 6.4.9,  ŚB 10.69.35,  ŚB 10.58.15-16

 

 https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01229.htm

    "Then those foremost of car-warriors (Krishna and Arjuna), riding in their cars and placing themselves on opposite sides of that forest, began a great slaughter, on all sides, of the creatures dwelling in Khandava"

    "The birds that took wings to escape from that conflagration were pierced by Arjuna with his shafts, and cut into pieces, they fell down into the burning element below. Pierced all over with Arjuna's shafts, the birds dropped down into the burning forest, uttering loud cries."

 https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-mahabharata-mohan/d/doc826441.html

The audition is heard that animals were created for sacrifice. They who eat flesh in any other way are said to follow the Rakshasa practice.

 Bhishma said, Listen to me as I tell you what the ordinance is that has been laid down for the Kshatriyas. They do not incur any fault by eating flesh that has been acquired by expenditure of prowess. All deer of the wilderness were dedicated to the deities and the Pitris in days of old, O king, by Agastya. Hence, the hunting of deer is not censured.

 

statements which oppose animal Sacrifices

 https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12b092.htm

 Wine, fish, honey, meat, alcohol, and preparations of rice and sesame seeds, have been introduced by knaves. The use of these (in sacrifices) is not laid down in the Vedas. The hankering after these arises from pride, error of judgment, and cupidity. They that are true Brahmanas realise the presence of Vishnu in every sacrifice. His worship, it has been laid down, should be made with agreeable Payasa.

https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12c037.htm

The Rishis said, The opinion entertained by us, O king, is that sacrifices should be performed with grain. The deities, however, maintain that sacrifices should be performed with animals. Do thou judge between us and tell us which of these opinions is correct.'

"Bhishma continued, 'Learning what the opinion was that was entertained by the deities, Vasu, moved by partiality for them, said that sacrifices should be performed with animals. At this answer, all the Rishis, endued with the splendour of the Sun, became very angry. Addressing Vasu who was seated on his car and who had (wrongly) taken up the side of the deities, they said unto him,--Since thou hast (wrongly) taken up the side of the deities, do thou fall down from heaven.

And those hardcore hindutwa vadis who argue that vedas or scriptures didn't sanction  meateating . They argue that verses were mistranslated.

They also say that some britishers polluted and twisted the scriptures with interpolations and mistranslations.

 

Note : Only persons with good knowledge of scriptures are welcome. Quoating with references is appreciated.

 This question is not for brainwashers who do not show any references.

 

Thank you

 

 

You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!

Join ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT

Email me when people reply –

Replies

                    • Sevak

                      Hare Krsna

                      Your hatred, poison and malice are not required here. Offenders of Srila Prabhupada are not allowed here,

                      Please go away and.never return

                      Hare Krsna

          • "the fact is that he was deluded"

            That is not a fact but pure fiction.

             

            • First prove that  muhammad was not a pedophile. prove  that he didn't marry a 6 year old child and didn't have sex with her when she was 9 years old.

              prove that " he fought wars only for defence. he didn't marry widows afrer killing their husbands, he didn't encourage sex slavery,

              he didn't encourage demolishing temples, he discouraged cow killing "

              Then we will know whether it is fact  or fiction..

              • Sevak

                Hare Krsna

                First prove that  muhammad was not a pedophile.

                Not required. We can chant hare Krsna, serve Krsna's devotee and achieve Krsna's lotus feet. 

                Hare Krsna

                 

                • You chant hare Krsna,No problem to anyone.

                  But if you want to glorify muhammad, you prove.

              • your tendency of fault finding is deplorable.Firstly you are exemplifying the characters of housefly rather than a saragrahi honeybee.

                Moreover your housefly behavior is also illusioned as there is no rubbish to sit on.

                • You didn't give a single answer to the question. No one will find fault  if you silently do your harekrishna without glorifying mlechas

                  When You don't have any answers you started barking. 

                  • Actually it was you that started barking , when you started to vilify srila prabhupada.

                    I didn't give any answer because there is not a useful KC question.

                    An answer is not deserved for some nonsensical ramblings of an idiot.

                    • You already know that i don't have  answer?How?

                      It just might be that i don't want to answer to stupidity personified ! it seems you have omniscience power alongwith garbage for brain.

                      In addition you claim that i know that i am the actual rambler!!. I know nothing of this ...oh omniscient imbecile !

                      why will i make excuses?i'll simply not reply if i don't know.

                      "we will question"??  now you think of  yourself in plural? your senses don't seem in order and you are calling me senseless.

                      nobody is useless my friend/enemy. e.g you too could be useful as a punching bag.isn't it?

                    • Sevak

                      Hare Krsna

                      Your hatred, poison and malice are not required here. Offenders of Srila Prabhupada are not allowed here,

                      Please go away and.never return

                      Hare Krsna

This reply was deleted.