In both Mahabharatha and Bhagavatham , and in some other sastras like Manudharma, there are discussions on animal Sacrifice and meat eating
All these scriptures agree on one point viz., " Killing animals is not a sin in sacrifice. Otherwise a great sin."
But still, we can find some statements against even animal Sacrifices which is not considered as sin.
The question that arises here is that if animal Sacrifices are sanctioned by scriptures, then why there are conflicting statements which oppose animal Sacrifices ?
statements which sanction animal Sacrifices
https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07064.htm
Of rigid vows and always engaged in due performance of sacrifices, countless animals, desirous of going to heaven, used to come to him of their own accord. 2 So large was the number of animals sacrificed in the Agnihotra of that king that the secretions flowing from his kitchen from the heaps of skins deposited there caused a veritable river which from this circumstance, came to be called the Charmanwati.
https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07064.htm
The sacred fire is fond of animal food,' this saying has come down to us. And at sacrifices animals are invariably killed by regenerate Brahmanas, and these animals being purged of sin, by incantation of hymns, go to heaven. If, O Brahmana, the sacred fire had not been so fond of animal food in ancient times, it could never have become the food of any one
ŚB 6.4.9, ŚB 10.69.35, ŚB 10.58.15-16
https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01229.htm
"Then those foremost of car-warriors (Krishna and Arjuna), riding in their cars and placing themselves on opposite sides of that forest, began a great slaughter, on all sides, of the creatures dwelling in Khandava"
"The birds that took wings to escape from that conflagration were pierced by Arjuna with his shafts, and cut into pieces, they fell down into the burning element below. Pierced all over with Arjuna's shafts, the birds dropped down into the burning forest, uttering loud cries."
https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-mahabharata-mohan/d/doc826441.html
The audition is heard that animals were created for sacrifice. They who eat flesh in any other way are said to follow the Rakshasa practice.
Bhishma said, Listen to me as I tell you what the ordinance is that has been laid down for the Kshatriyas. They do not incur any fault by eating flesh that has been acquired by expenditure of prowess. All deer of the wilderness were dedicated to the deities and the Pitris in days of old, O king, by Agastya. Hence, the hunting of deer is not censured.
statements which oppose animal Sacrifices
https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12b092.htm
Wine, fish, honey, meat, alcohol, and preparations of rice and sesame seeds, have been introduced by knaves. The use of these (in sacrifices) is not laid down in the Vedas. The hankering after these arises from pride, error of judgment, and cupidity. They that are true Brahmanas realise the presence of Vishnu in every sacrifice. His worship, it has been laid down, should be made with agreeable Payasa.
https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12c037.htm
The Rishis said, The opinion entertained by us, O king, is that sacrifices should be performed with grain. The deities, however, maintain that sacrifices should be performed with animals. Do thou judge between us and tell us which of these opinions is correct.'
"Bhishma continued, 'Learning what the opinion was that was entertained by the deities, Vasu, moved by partiality for them, said that sacrifices should be performed with animals. At this answer, all the Rishis, endued with the splendour of the Sun, became very angry. Addressing Vasu who was seated on his car and who had (wrongly) taken up the side of the deities, they said unto him,--Since thou hast (wrongly) taken up the side of the deities, do thou fall down from heaven.
And those hardcore hindutwa vadis who argue that vedas or scriptures didn't sanction meateating . They argue that verses were mistranslated.
They also say that some britishers polluted and twisted the scriptures with interpolations and mistranslations.
Note : Only persons with good knowledge of scriptures are welcome. Quoating with references is appreciated.
This question is not for brainwashers who do not show any references.
Thank you
Replies
Hare Krishna,
Any person ( jiva tattva) who is raising a voice against something and is followed by 1000's of people who is leading a big mass of people for any cause ( be it bhakti or mukti, or animal rights or against rapists or against corruption ) and who is making 1000's of people who change and accept him is said to be having Shaki and avesha.
Just like in telugu we say " Ammavaru poonindi" meaning " uske upar shakti ( goddess) aa gayi hai.
means that the person at that perticular instance of time having the avesham ( the energy) of amma ( goddess /shakti). After sometime that person comes back to his originality.
In that sense we can say. Jesus, buddha and Mohammad were doing something for humanity they made people who no idea of God....... know that there is God or Self awareness /nirvana in case of Buddha.
Now that doesn't mean they are Vishnu tattva. They are Jiva tattva only and Srila Prabhupada clarified it when asked -
"Lord Jesus Christ or Lord Buddha, they come within the jīva-tattva especial power."
Even for instance=> Ranga Krishna tomorrow makes this a big hype of TV and media about the animal slaughter and run a rally and turn 1000's of people into vegans. Thant Mr. Ranga Krishna will be called Shaktyavesha avatara.
Because he is turning people towards a cause. Able to make so many follow his path. But Ranga Krishna is simply a Jiva tattva not having any Vishnu tattva. He just has avesham ( /emotional/rage) and Shakti ( power to change many people.
Take in positive sense. And never insult a Vaishnava who sacrificed his whole like for Krishna and spread Krishna name, opened so many temples, Spread the glories of Krishna in various continents and also Who chanted Holy name of Lord daily whole life time. It is a big sin. Krishna may not be happy.
If you start to chant max. 1 -2 mala it is possible sometimes we do 16 mala next day we may not have any mood. This is how we are So, we have no right to even point out at a person who has chanted whole life.
Pride is very bad. When we are prideful we do such comments on others. Srila Prabhupada is a very elderly man than you.... plus he is not even there now to defend against you.
So better you say sorry internally to Srila Prabhupada. Even a vaishnava will forgive but Krishna wont forgive if any one insults a Pure devotee.
So just becareful and donate Tulasi plant to some pure devotee.
Hare Krishna
Hare Krishna,
I don't get it? What is the question actually? Are u in the favor of killing animals or are you against it?
Killing animals is not a sin in sacrifice ..otherwise a great sin? Do I AGREE TO THIS OR NOT?
Ya kill animals for appeasing demigods is not a sin as per vedas ( in olden times).
Now also these muslims kills bakri for pleasing their god. ( as if they have a seperate god).
For Krishna-- Kill LUST, ANGER, GREED in you and appease HIM.
Maybe for demigods - they want animal sacrifices. ( well how can any god be pleased thats a big question)... except the tantric gods. ( kali, durga, chamundi, chinnamasta etc.) these tantric sadhanas are generally done to get some benefit in return.
For our Little Krishna.- all He needs is your love for HIM. You can show love by offerig a small flower, fruit or leaf or little bit of makkhan ( didn't he tell us in BG clearly what He wants )
patram puspam phalam toyam
yo me bhaktya prayacchati
tad aham bhakty-upahrtam
asnami prayatatmanah (9.26 BG)
If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit a water, I will accept it.
If he would have just added non veg will please me. Then surely we also like our muslim bhai bahen will cut bakri. But our Krishna is very simple. He asked very simple things to offer.
Btw our main aim is not some benefit out of this relationship with Krishna. Our aim is kill and sacrficie the- lust greed anger in us and offer ourselves ( Atmanivedanam) to Krishna for nothing in return. ( we are not seeking gaadi, banglow or something else from krishna).
Tantriks perform these rituals for some ulterior benefits. Vedas contains some part of Tantra sadhana + mantra sadhana techniques.
We should restrict ourselves to Mantra sadhana instead of Tantra sadhana ( why? because Krishna doesn't require killing of other animals. .. all krishna requires is Killing our lust, greed and anger)
Hare Krishna
Hare Krsna
tarko ’pratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā
nāsāv ṛṣir yasya mataṁ na bhinnam
dharmasya tattvaṁ nihitaṁ guhāyāṁ
mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ
Dry arguments are inconclusive. A great personality whose opinion does not differ from others is not considered a great sage. Simply by studying the Vedas, which are variegated, one cannot come to the right path by which religious principles are understood. The solid truth of religious principles is hidden in the heart of an unadulterated, self-realized person. Consequently, as the śāstras confirm, one should accept whatever progressive path the mahājanas advocate. Mahābhārata, Vana-pārva (313.117).
Hare Krsna
It would be interesting to explore whether these contradictions arise from different time periods, sectarian influences, or deeper metaphysical understandings of dharma.
SPRUNKI GAME
Hare Krsna Prabhu
All the scriptures are not the same. Some are for the mode of goodness. Some in the mode for passion. Some in the mode for ignorance. Of the Sattvic Puranas, Srimad Bhagavatam is chief. Then there is the devotee Bhagavata. There is no difference between the book Bhagavatam and the devotee Bhagavata Srila Prabhupada. Who can explain the real import of the text. Surrender to Him, because only the spiritual master can give you divine eyes to see the text in true light.
The following is the most conclusive statement regarding meat eating and it's consequences given in the Srimad-Bhagavatam and explained in perfect detail by Srila Prabhupada:
sva-praanaan yah para-praanaih
prapusnaaty aghrnah khalah
tad-vadhas tasya hi sreyo
yad-dosaad yaaty adhah pumaan
Translation
A cruel and wretched person who maintains his existence at the cost of other's lives deserves to be killed for his own well-being, otherwise he will go down by his own actions.
Purport
According to civic codes and religious principles, even the killer of an animal is to be considered a murderer because animal food is never meant for civilized man, whose prime duty is to prepare himself for going back to Godhead. In the act of killing an animal, there is a regular conspiracy by the part of sinners, and all of them are liable to be punished as murderers exactly like a party of conspirators who kill a human being combinedly. He who gives permission, he who kills the animal, he who cooks the slaughtered animal, he who administers distribution of the food stuff, and at last he who eats such cooked animal food are all murderers, and all of them are liable to be punished by the laws of nature.
Srimad- Bhagavatam 1.7.37
Hari Bol
You think Prabhupada an enlightened person and surrender to him if you want.
But he praises a mlecha Muhammad whose character is exactly like Ravanasura, as a saktyavesa avatar.
So, it is difficult for us to believe that he is enlightened .
we don't think but know Srila Prabhupada to be supremely enlightened.
It might be difficult for you to believe but it is the truth.Just like in ancient times it was difficult for some to believe that earth is round.Difficult in believing didn't make the earth flat!!
Hare Krsna
You think Prabhupada an enlightened person and surrender to him if you want.
Thank you for your blessings. I am trying my best.
But he praises a mlecha Muhammad whose character is exactly like Ravanasura, as a saktyavesa avatar.
vidyā-vinaya-sampanne
brāhmaṇe gavi hastini
śuni caiva śva-pāke ca
paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ
The humble sages, by virtue of true knowledge, see with equal vision a learned and gentle brāhmaṇa, a cow, an elephant, a dog and a dog-eater [outcaste]. (BG 5.18)
it is difficult for us to believe that he is enlightened .
True. Many western hippies who had not heard the name of Sri Krsna were fortunate to understand and believe it. They receive the compassion of Sri Krsna that flows through Srila prabhupada becuase they had the humility and hunger for enlightenment.
Warning : This website/ forum is dedicated to spread Krsna consiousness in line with divine teachings of His Divine Grace Abhaya Charanaravinda Bhaktivedanta Swami Srila Prabhupada. Any words that even appear slightly derogatory to Sri Krsna or devotees or Srila Prabhupada or other devotees or vedic literature will be dealt appropriately.
Hare Krsna
The sloka intends to show compassion to every jeeva. It doesn't mean that you praise wicked demons and cow killers as saktyavesa avatar.
What is the characteristic of saktyavesa avatar ? kill men and forcefully marry widows ? killing cows ? demolish temples ?
He enlightened hippies. very good. But he didn't dare to go to Arabia to enlighten demons called muslims. We kknow what these demons will do if he dared to go there. But even if he went there and successfully returned with life, the fact is that he was deluded when he says a demon muhammad as a saktyavesa avatar, a great vaishnava, a great acharya.