I’ve been playing on PokiGames, and it’s honestly one of the best free gaming platforms I’ve found. The site runs fast, looks clean, and has a massive collection of games — from fun puzzles to action and strategy titles. What I really like is how easy it is to jump in without downloads or sign-ups. Plus, there aren’t annoying ads breaking the flow. PokiGames is perfect for quick gaming breaks or long sessions when you just want to relax and have fun.
Govind Sharan > Madhava dasOctober 15, 2025 at 4:45pm
Huh?! People living in glass houses shouldn’t dare throw stones at others! I’m no snake, it’s you who’s been spewing venom all over this forum with your toxic replies. I get it, after drowning yourself in two bottles of liquor and puffing on that cheap weed, self-control isn’t exactly your strength. Still, you’re hallucinating. Hari Hari.
Govind Sharan > Madhava dasOctober 15, 2025 at 6:50pm
Oh, so you’re Vishnu and now Sesa-Naag too? You literally sleep on yourself? What kind of twisted philosophy is that? And you have the nerve to call me a mayavadi? You’re out here turning into every god - Krishna, Kalki, and now even Shesh Naag. Seriously, what kind of hell is this?
Ahangropasana (ekatvena) as explained by HG Chaitanya Charan Das in transcript of Bhakti-shastri class on verse 9.15 Bhagavad-gita as it is. " Ahangropasana is worship of oneself as absolute truth. It is not mayavada because one doesn't offend Krishna's form. What makes mayavada offensive is the notion that Krishna's form is material, Krishna's form is illusory, Krishna's form is false, and that one has to go beyond Krishna's form to some other higher reality, that notion is what is offensive, and that is the notion that one needs to give up. So for Ahangropasana (ekatvena), Srila Prabhupada mentions in purport that such people think themselves to be the Supreme Lord, and in this mentality they worship themselves. This is also a type of God worship. " Hari bol
Govind Sharan > Madhava dasOctober 14, 2025 at 9:19pm
Oh wow, amazing! So let’s just drop everything and stop worshipping Sri Krishna, right? From now on, we’ll all start bowing down to ourselves. Let’s make a grand declaration — “I am the Supreme Personality of Godhead!” What a revelation! You’ve read a bit about Ahangropasana and suddenly — boom! enlightenment struck: You’re God!
And of course, everyone else who’s read a few scriptures like you will also think the same, “I’m God too!” So tell me, what’s next? A whole world full of gods roaming around, each claiming the throne? Divine chaos at its finest. Hari Hari.
Madhava das > Govind SharanOctober 14, 2025 at 11:07pm
Hare Krsna Govind Sharan Prabhu
" Aap Govind ki sharan kab grahan karoge ?" :((
Perhaps you find it amazing Prabhu but as far as I am concerned it is not too wonderful!
" There are other persons who are not exactly in the position of mahatma but who worship Krsna also, in different ways. Some of them have already been described as the distressed, the financially destitute, the inquisitive, and those who are engaged in the cultivation of knowledge. But there are others who are still lower, and these are divided into three:
(1) he who worships himself as one with the Supreme Lord,
(2) he who concocts some form of the Supreme Lord and worships that, and
(3) he who accepts the universal form, the visva-rupa of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and worships that. Out of the above three, the lowest, those who worship themselves as the Supreme Lord, thinking themselves to be monists, are most predominant. "
Bhagavad-gita as it is 9.15 PURPORT
In a way you are right also Prabhu when you say, " A whole world full of gods roaming around, each claiming the throne? Divine chaos at its finest. " Srila Prabhupada also admits in the PURPORT that those who worship themselves as the Supreme Lord, are most predominant. So this is actually what is happening. This is another reason why I fail to see your excitement since it is already so common!
However, when you say from now on, we'll start bowing down to ourselves. I find it amusing because I don't quite understand how anybody can bow to himself? Are we supposed to do that in front of a mirror?
I remember once you advised me to read Adi Sankaracarya.
Is that what they teach in the mayavada school?
Why did you ask me to read Adi Sankaracarya?
You should also reciprocate and answer my question if you have some basic gratitude in you because I am honestly trying to answer you as the best I can.
Hari bol
Govind Sharan > Madhava dasOctober 15, 2025 at 4:37pm
I don't think Adi Shankaracharya as mayavadi at all place. Do you consider Gīta Govindam as a mayavadi bhashya? Hari Hari.
Govind Sharan > Madhava dasOctober 15, 2025 at 5:18pm
Don’t beat around the bush. Answer me, do you consider Gīta Govindam as a mayavadi bhashya? Apart from this, Mahaprabhu was also mayavadi. He propagates to read the mayavadi-bhashya of Sridhara Svami, who was the Shankaracharya at 14th C.E.
“Śrīdhara Svāmī is the spiritual master of the entire world because by his mercy we can understand Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. I therefore accept him as a spiritual master."
śrīdharera anugata ye kare likhana saba loka mānya kari’ karibe grahaṇa “One who comments on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam following in the footsteps of Śrīdhara Svāmī will be honored and accepted by everyone."
śrīdharānugata kara bhāgavata-vyākhyāna abhimāna chāḍi’ bhaja kṛṣṇa bhagavān “Put forth your explanation of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam following in the footsteps of Śrīdhara Svāmī. Giving up your false pride, worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa."
This mayavadi acharya is enough for your arguments. Hari Hari.
Madhava das > Govind SharanOctober 17, 2025 at 2:23am
Hare Krsna
One may also refer to the longest PURPORT in Sri Caitanya-caritamrta regarding this discussion. I have highlighted only one paragraph from which it is evident that Sridhara Svami is not a mayavadi acarya. In fact Sridhara Svami completely refutes Sankaracarya's statement regarding Sankarasana.
" Considering all these points one should understand that Sankaracarya's statement that Sankarsana is born as a jiva is completely against the Vedic statements. His assertions are completely refuted by the above arguments. In this connection the commentary of Sridhara Svami on Srimad-Bhagavatam (3.1.34) is very helpful. "
Sri Caitanya-caritamrta Adi 5.41 PURPORT
Hari bol
Govind Sharan > Madhava dasOctober 17, 2025 at 9:48am
Should i consider Srila Prabhupada in a same way as you are considering Sridhara Svami. Can I also say Srila Prabhupada was not a gaudiya because he speaks out against the gaudiya philosophy sometimes? Your arguement is easily refutable. Advaita Purāṇa commentaries or tattva-prakāśikās that interpret the four vyūhas allegorically - not historically or theologically. Hari Hari.
Replies
I’ve been playing on PokiGames, and it’s honestly one of the best free gaming platforms I’ve found. The site runs fast, looks clean, and has a massive collection of games — from fun puzzles to action and strategy titles. What I really like is how easy it is to jump in without downloads or sign-ups. Plus, there aren’t annoying ads breaking the flow. PokiGames is perfect for quick gaming breaks or long sessions when you just want to relax and have fun.
Huh?! People living in glass houses shouldn’t dare throw stones at others! I’m no snake, it’s you who’s been spewing venom all over this forum with your toxic replies. I get it, after drowning yourself in two bottles of liquor and puffing on that cheap weed, self-control isn’t exactly your strength. Still, you’re hallucinating. Hari Hari.
Oh, so you’re Vishnu and now Sesa-Naag too? You literally sleep on yourself? What kind of twisted philosophy is that? And you have the nerve to call me a mayavadi? You’re out here turning into every god - Krishna, Kalki, and now even Shesh Naag. Seriously, what kind of hell is this?
Ahangropasana (ekatvena) as explained by HG Chaitanya Charan Das in transcript of Bhakti-shastri class on verse 9.15 Bhagavad-gita as it is.
" Ahangropasana is worship of oneself as absolute truth. It is not mayavada because one doesn't offend Krishna's form. What makes mayavada offensive is the notion that Krishna's form is material, Krishna's form is illusory, Krishna's form is false, and that one has to go beyond Krishna's form to some other higher reality, that notion is what is offensive, and that is the notion that one needs to give up.
So for Ahangropasana (ekatvena), Srila Prabhupada mentions in purport that such people think themselves to be the Supreme Lord, and in this mentality they worship themselves. This is also a type of God worship. "
Hari bol
Oh wow, amazing! So let’s just drop everything and stop worshipping Sri Krishna, right? From now on, we’ll all start bowing down to ourselves. Let’s make a grand declaration — “I am the Supreme Personality of Godhead!” What a revelation! You’ve read a bit about Ahangropasana and suddenly — boom! enlightenment struck: You’re God!
And of course, everyone else who’s read a few scriptures like you will also think the same, “I’m God too!” So tell me, what’s next? A whole world full of gods roaming around, each claiming the throne? Divine chaos at its finest. Hari Hari.
Hare Krsna Govind Sharan Prabhu
" Aap Govind ki sharan kab grahan karoge ?" :((
Perhaps you find it amazing Prabhu but as far as I am concerned it is not too wonderful!
" There are other persons who are not exactly in the position of mahatma but who worship Krsna also, in different ways. Some of them have already been described as the distressed, the financially destitute, the inquisitive, and those who are engaged in the cultivation of knowledge. But there are others who are still lower, and these are divided into three:
(1) he who worships himself as one with the Supreme Lord,
(2) he who concocts some form of the Supreme Lord and worships that, and
(3) he who accepts the universal form, the visva-rupa of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and worships that. Out of the above three, the lowest, those who worship themselves as the Supreme Lord, thinking themselves to be monists, are most predominant. "
Bhagavad-gita as it is 9.15 PURPORT
In a way you are right also Prabhu when you say, " A whole world full of gods roaming around, each claiming the throne? Divine chaos at its finest. " Srila Prabhupada also admits in the PURPORT that those who worship themselves as the Supreme Lord, are most predominant. So this is actually what is happening. This is another reason why I fail to see your excitement since it is already so common!
However, when you say from now on, we'll start bowing down to ourselves. I find it amusing because I don't quite understand how anybody can bow to himself? Are we supposed to do that in front of a mirror?
I remember once you advised me to read Adi Sankaracarya.
Is that what they teach in the mayavada school?
Why did you ask me to read Adi Sankaracarya?
You should also reciprocate and answer my question if you have some basic gratitude in you because I am honestly trying to answer you as the best I can.
Hari bol
I don't think Adi Shankaracharya as mayavadi at all place. Do you consider Gīta Govindam as a mayavadi bhashya? Hari Hari.
Don’t beat around the bush. Answer me, do you consider Gīta Govindam as a mayavadi bhashya? Apart from this, Mahaprabhu was also mayavadi. He propagates to read the mayavadi-bhashya of Sridhara Svami, who was the Shankaracharya at 14th C.E.
śrīdhara-svāmi-prasāde ‘bhāgavata’ jāni
jagad-guru śrīdhara-svāmī ‘guru’ kari’ māni
“Śrīdhara Svāmī is the spiritual master of the entire world because by his mercy we can understand Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. I therefore accept him as a spiritual master."
śrīdharera anugata ye kare likhana
saba loka mānya kari’ karibe grahaṇa
“One who comments on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam following in the footsteps of Śrīdhara Svāmī will be honored and accepted by everyone."
śrīdharānugata kara bhāgavata-vyākhyāna
abhimāna chāḍi’ bhaja kṛṣṇa bhagavān
“Put forth your explanation of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam following in the footsteps of Śrīdhara Svāmī. Giving up your false pride, worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa."
This mayavadi acharya is enough for your arguments. Hari Hari.
Hare Krsna
One may also refer to the longest PURPORT in Sri Caitanya-caritamrta regarding this discussion. I have highlighted only one paragraph from which it is evident that Sridhara Svami is not a mayavadi acarya. In fact Sridhara Svami completely refutes Sankaracarya's statement regarding Sankarasana.
" Considering all these points one should understand that Sankaracarya's statement that Sankarsana is born as a jiva is completely against the Vedic statements. His assertions are completely refuted by the above arguments. In this connection the commentary of Sridhara Svami on Srimad-Bhagavatam (3.1.34) is very helpful. "
Sri Caitanya-caritamrta Adi 5.41 PURPORT
Hari bol
Should i consider Srila Prabhupada in a same way as you are considering Sridhara Svami. Can I also say Srila Prabhupada was not a gaudiya because he speaks out against the gaudiya philosophy sometimes? Your arguement is easily refutable. Advaita Purāṇa commentaries or tattva-prakāśikās that interpret the four vyūhas allegorically - not historically or theologically. Hari Hari.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next