Hare Krsna
" Very recently an archaelogist published findings indicating that Lord Christ, after being buried, was exhumed and that he then went to Kashmir. "
Srimad-Bhagavatam 7.3.18 Purport
Unless there is great relevance in this statement it would not find itself in thd pages of Bhaktivedanta literature.
It appears that the soul can exist even through the bones, as shown by the personal example of Hiranyakasipu. It shouldn't be hard to believe in the resurrrection of Jesus Christ!
Replies
I did reply but you are running away like a culprit from the truth and didn't responded to my reply.
Didn't you know, Jesus, instead of elevating his followers, adjusted by indulging with drunkards and meat-eaters, eventually becoming one himself. And Prophet Muhammad? He aligned himself with a fabricated "Allah" and led a cult of violence, forever staining his legacy with bloodshed. Is this your idea of divine adjustment? A true enlightened being, like Hari Das Thakur, remains unaffected by people, place, or time—untouched by the ignorance of the world.
Hare Krsna
No i don't know what you are saying. Jesus is Mowgli or whatever. Prabhupada didn't speak like that. I am not going to respond to you henceforth because you are offensive.
What the hell! You froth at the mouth when someone dares to question your "Mowgli Jesus" (a fitting analogy, given his primitive understanding of spirituality), yet you casually equate Śrī Kṛṣṇa—the Supreme Personality of Godhead to an insect super hero? What sublime hypocrisy!
Jesus, by his own admission, was a lost sheep ("I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel"—Matthew 15:24), who couldn’t even grasp the basics of karma and reincarnation. Hence his ghostly rebirth in Kashmir.
Yet you dare an apraadh when someone exposes the laughable inadequacies of your borrowed messiahs? The real apraadh is your blindness to the glaring difference between a true divine incarnation and a misguided preacher.
A wise man once said: "A fool worships a footstool and calls it a throne." Need I say more?
Awaiting your enlightened rebuttal—if any exists.
The comparison with a spider is given with respect to Sri Krsna by Srila Prabhupada in the Bhaktivedanta literature.
You will suffer from the mad elephant offense.
Hare Krsna Mataji
Please don't make Khichdi. God + Krsna + Allah + Hollywood served in one dish.
Actually, the idea is explained in Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.9.9 Purport:
" Expert religionists know perfectly well how to adjust religious principles in terms of time and space. All the great acaryas or religious preachers or reformers of the world executed their mission by adjustment of religious principles in terms of time and place. There are different climates and situations in different parts of the world, and if one has to discharge his duties to preach the message of the Lord, he must be expert in adjusting things in terms of the time and place. "
Hari Bol
Jesus, instead of elevating his followers, adjusted by indulging with drunkards and meat-eaters, eventually becoming one himself. And Prophet Muhammad? He aligned himself with a fabricated "Allah" and led a cult of violence, forever staining his legacy with bloodshed. Is this your idea of divine adjustment? A true enlightened being, like Hari Das Thakur, remains unaffected by people, place, or time—untouched by the ignorance of the world.
Yet, your so-called messiahs succumbed to the lowest vices and darkest impulses. Where is their divinity? Where is their detachment? A real yogi does not dilute his wisdom to appease sinners; he uplifts them without contamination.
But of course, you’ll cling to your fairy tales, ignoring the stark truth: True saints stand unwavering, while false prophets drown in their own hypocrisy.
When will you wake up? Remembering the words of Nava Kiśora Nimāi Dasa prabhu:
abhī nahī jāge to sulā diye jāoge.
jalate hue cirāga ko, bujhā diye jāoge.
do you know what ardha kukkuti nyaya is? much of your expositions are grounded in such.if you go by cc then you know that you can't possibly ascertain the motives of a shuddha bhakta by just looking at the externals.I fail to understand that what purpose is served by maligning the name of jesus,buddha,guru nanak and the like.
I understand what are you saying and taunting me gaurav chauhan I am not able to understand Buddha ( who is Shoonyawaadi) we don't support buddhism.
Srila Prabhupada ji called Sikhism is concocted mixture of both islam and chirstianity.
This guy Madhava das prabhu ji is basically a sikh. He suddenly gets hyper when we say Sikhism is mayavaad and concocted.......It is for time and circumstances created concocted.
Jesus who speaks about compassion and carries a sheep.. eats goat meat. I don't understand Jesus compassion at all. He is seen drinking wine and eating meat. and show deep compassion for sheep alone.
These days I am finding is amusing to see people are making comparisions with Jesus's sheep and Krishna holding a cow.
If they really find so much deep relationships then fine.. who really cares.. All that I care is praising glorifying Krishna ... funny even though Bible never mentions not even a word of Krishna.
I don't have personal rivalry for religions nor I hate people of other religions.
I have a feeling we must just focus on Krishna as Sarva dharmaan parityajyam mam ekum sharan vrajah is told.
If you find Jesus and guru nanak and Buddha are great people and want to include them. I don't care. go ahead
Just don't like to be a part of this discussion anymore. Thanks
Hare Krsna Mataji
Lord Buddha is the Supreme Personality of Godhead so He is free to do anything.
As far as Srila Prabhupada is concerned, even if you are quoting the morning walk, atleast quote him properly. There is no mention of Jesus Christ in the Guru Granth Sahib, although it is definetly encouraged to do bhakti like Dhruva or Prahlada.
" Naam japo ji aise aise Dhruv Prahlada japio Hari jaise."
Hari Bol
Okay Lord Buddha is great Shankarcharya is great. Guru nanak is great Jesus is super great and Jains are fine.. all religions are great.
I dont think there is a need to covert to Vaishnavism anymore.
All are fine whereever they are.
Lord Buddha is Supreme Lord?
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
of 6 Next