I have a bit of doubts in the sampradayic differences. Even though we say gaudiya sampradaya belongs to Madhava line , some people have opposed it. But i do have some genuine doubts.
Like for example , we say that the lord had liberated putana and she then went to vaikunth. Even envious people attain moksha like putana , shishupala , ravana. But contrast this with those in madhava line , for exsample Sri Vadiraja Tirtha on what he says about putana , . , Sri Vadiraja gives the true interpretation of the text & establishes the theory of JIVADVAYA AAVESHA. In the body of PUthana, there were two souls- 1. Urvasi, a divine one & 2. TAtaka, an asuric one. The former gave Him milk & went back to heaven while the latter gave Him poison & fell into the eternal hells of TAmisra & Andha tAmisra. He has ably argued his case in 20 verses from 41 to 60 & pays a glowing tribute to Sri Madhwa's school of thought. (SOURCE :https://sites.google.com/site/harshalarajesh/rukminishavijaya-canto2)
Now thats where my confusion arises. Madhva is an authority so is Sri Vadiraja tirtha. How can our INTERPRETATIONS be different ? Did putana really get mokosha or there were two pepole inside her and one went to hell and the other to heaven ? Both cases occuring at once are not possible in my opinon.
And i really don't understand the tripartate classification of souls which sripad madhva did due to my deficiemcy in understanding. I really don't get how nitya samsarins can get moksha . And the concepts of tamo yogins is also not really understandable to me ( because im dumb lol).
And i found one huuuge lenghty debate : read here : https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/is-madhvas-dvaita-vedanta-consistent-with-classical-hindu-thought-and-is-it-valid.194601/
The ISKCONite here gave tough arguments. But i really still don't undetsand this. Can someone exaplain whether the tripartae system is like the abrahamic concept where some are created for eternal damnation and some to heaven ?
If it is so then some madhva authorities ( READ : AUTHORITIES) gave JIVADVAYA AAVESHA ? Are we wrong when we say putana attained moksha ? Is the lord partial towards some jivas ? ( which is not the case )
I wholly acknowledge Sripad Madhva as an authority .
a sastra-nirakshara bhikshuk