Vyaas Dev was accused of being mistaken by Sripad Shankaracharya!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hare Krishna Prabhuji. Dandavat Pranam. All glories to Srila Prabhupada

Extract from Brahma Sutra Bhashya of Sri Adi Sanakara - Part I
translated by George Thibaut

Sutra 1.1.2. (Brahman is that) from which the origin, &c. (i.e. the origin, subsistence, and dissolution) of this (world proceed).

Commentry by Shankaracharya

The origin, &c. of a world possessing the attributes stated above cannot possibly proceed from anything else but a Lord possessing the stated qualities; not either from a non-intelligent prâdhana , or from atoms, or from non-being,
or from a being subject to transmigration ; nor, again, can it proceed from its own nature (i.e. spontaneously, without a cause), since we observe that (for the production of effects) special places, times, and causes have invariably to be employed.

(Some of) those who maintain a Lord to be the cause of the world , think that the existence of a Lord different from mere transmigrating beings can be inferred by means of the argument stated just now (without recourse being had to Scripture at all).--But, it might be said, you yourself in the Sûtra under discussion have merely brought forward the same argument!--By no means, we reply

So in the second stanza Shankarachraya refuted Vyasa and indirectly accused Vyasa for giving conclusion of existence of a Lord separate from the phenomenon world

Hope this will help

Your aspiring servant
Hari Bol

Replies

Volunteer

Sudipta Roy September 18, 2012 at 11:20am

Hare Krishna Prabhuji. Dandavat Pranam. All glories to Srila Prabhupada

While commenting on Vyasa's vedanta sutra or Brahma sutra in the book Saririka Bhasya, Shankaracharya drawn wrong Conclusion of the original meaning of Vedanta code Which Vyasa didn't intend to explain and emphasis that Vyasa was wrong at some point to establish the validity of his own philosophy, Chaitanya Charitramrta is referring to this only.

Hope this will help
your aspiring Servant
Hari Bol
- This reply was deleted.
  - Volunteer
    
    Sudipta Roy September 19, 2012 at 11:40am
    
    Hare Krishna Prabhuji. Dandavat Pranam. All glories to Srila Prabhupada
    
    Extract from Brahma Sutra Bhashya of Sri Adi Sanakara - Part I
    translated by George Thibaut
    
    Sutra 1.1.2. (Brahman is that) from which the origin, &c. (i.e. the origin, subsistence, and dissolution) of this (world proceed).
    
    Commentry by Shankaracharya
    
    The origin, &c. of a world possessing the attributes stated above cannot possibly proceed from anything else but a Lord possessing the stated qualities; not either from a non-intelligent prâdhana , or from atoms, or from non-being,
    or from a being subject to transmigration ; nor, again, can it proceed from its own nature (i.e. spontaneously, without a cause), since we observe that (for the production of effects) special places, times, and causes have invariably to be employed.
    
    (Some of) those who maintain a Lord to be the cause of the world , think that the existence of a Lord different from mere transmigrating beings can be inferred by means of the argument stated just now (without recourse being had to Scripture at all).--But, it might be said, you yourself in the Sûtra under discussion have merely brought forward the same argument!--By no means, we reply
    
    So in the second stanza Shankarachraya refuted Vyasa and indirectly accused Vyasa for giving conclusion of existence of a Lord separate from the phenomenon world
    
    Hope this will help
    
    Your aspiring servant
    Hari Bol

This reply was deleted.