Forum

           It is said that Srimad Bhagavatam is non different from Lord Sri Krsna and so we can say that whatever is said in Bhagavatam is transcendental and higher dimensional (i.e every verse is beyond our material intelligence),only by the grace of Lord we can understand Bhagavatam.

           Every higher dimensional object has a three dimensional structure(the accessible dimension of human beings).As for example, the higher dimensional transcendental Vrndavan has a three dimensional model which we see as our earthly Vrndavan,the modern space scientists have gone to the higher dimensional moon planet but they succeed in accessing only the three dimensional structure of it,the same thing is happened with the transcendental higher dimensional Navadvip,our earthly little Himalaya is the three dimensional structure of the higher dimensional large Himalaya of Bhagavatam.

             Srimad Bhagavatam gives a perfect higher dimensional model of our Universe which looks like a banyan tree with roots in upwards direction and branches in downward directions but as we can access only upto lower dimensions,we see this universe different from its original structure,in our limited vision we see that this universe is infinite in size,it has no creator and it is not well balanced etc etc but the real thing is different and this virtual reality which pervades the actual reality from us is a form of maya for which we can not see the actual object.

             In time of discussing the motions of the planets in this lower dimensional structure of this universe (which is accessible for us), our modern scientists use the HELIOCENTRIC MODEL (i.e taking the Sun at center,all planets of this solar family are moving in distinct circular orbits) and Our Astronomers of "Surya Sidhhanta" use the GEOCENTRIC MODEL(i.e taking earth at center, Sun and all other planets of our solar family are moving in distinct circular orbits)

             So please discuss on this topic that which model of planetary motion is correct (i.e either Heliocentric model or Geocentric model) or these both models are incorrect or these both models are correct in our three dimensional conception of Universe and the existence of other models of planetary motion which can be applicable in discussing the planetary motions of our accessibility.