Srila Prabhupada Vs. Osho

Both Srila Prabhupada and Osho (Acharya Rajneesh)  were preaching and practicing different schools of thought . They were not supporting each other also . Let me know , how is Krishna Bhakti as taught by ISKCON (and other similar vaishnav institutes ) is the  best and suitable  form of worhip in today's  context . Kindly notice , while glorifying Srila Prabhupada in your reply ; do not use harsh words for OSHO . Analyze both Srila Prabhupada and Osho  under the same shade and light .

Thanks !!!!

You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!

Join ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT

Email me when people reply –


  • Dear Atul ji,

    Sanatan Dharma is for people of different category. Every person whether devotee , Mayavadi, Voidist will be attracted to a particular deity , faith etc based on his samskaras of past life . So there is no point comparing one another.If one reads the puranas and when it specifically talks about kaliyuga, we will see that in all cases it is referring to Harinaam as the  only medium by which a soul can be delivered. There are a lot of references which other devotees might present if they like .

    However it does not signify to look down upon other paths like merging with impersonal brahman void etc . Many poeple prefer to merge with brahman than become Lord's servent. It is their personal choice as per their past samskaras . But in kaliyuga the chance of success is minimal due to human defects , limited mind power ,power of concentration , proper environment etc.

    Harinaam is specifically meant for people of kaliyuga as they are with limited intelligence and power as per the scriptures.




This reply was deleted.