श्रीभगवान् बोले -- मेरा यह जो रूप तुमने देखा है, इसके दर्शन अत्यन्त ही दुर्लभ हैं। इस रूपको देखनेके लिये देवता भी नित्य लालायित रहते हैं।
purport by srila prabhupada -
In the forty-eighth verse of this chapter Lord Krishna concluded revealing His universal form and informed Arjuna that this form is not possible to be seen by so many pious activities, sacrifices, etc. Now here the word su-durdarsham is used, indicating that Krishna’s two-handed form is still more confidential.
by ramsukhdas -
व्याख्या -- सुदुर्दर्शमिदं रूपं दृष्टवानसि यन्मम -- यहाँ सुदुर्दर्शम् पद चतुर्भुजरूपके लिये ही आया है ! विराट्रूप या द्विभुजरूपके लिये नहीं। कारण कि विराट्रूपकी तो देवता भी कल्पना क्यों करने लगे और मनुष्यरूप जब मनुष्योंके लिये सुलभ था. तब देवताओंके लिये वह दुर्लभ कैसे होता इसलिये सुदुर्दर्शम् पदसे भगवान् विष्णुका चतुर्भुजरूप ही लेना चाहिये जिसके लिये देवरूपम् (11। 45) और स्वकं रूपम् (11। 50) पद आये हैं।
i'm confused about this two commentaries because one says two-handed form and other commentary says four handed because in many instances demigods have seen four handed form like at the time of samudra manthan many demigods and asuras seen four handed form of bhagwan when lord lifting mandar mountain..also at the time of some wars like when personality of godhead killed kaalnemi..etc..also in dwapar on earth many human beings seen krishna's two handed form...so that 'sududarshanam' word is for vishwaroopa ?
Replies
yes prabhuji..but you understood my recent response.. i gave reply to your opinion - "Anyway ,its look like Krishna was talking here about four handed form which Arjuna have seen just moments before.Thats my opinion."
not to prabhupada's purport.
i was just wants to say that srila prabhupada's purport on 11.52 is same as srila vishwanatha chakravarty thakur's commentary also both commentaries are pointing to two handed form and im with it,nothing else. i was confused about 11.52 that krishna was saying about his two handed form or four handed??but after seeing srila vishwanatha chakravarty thakur's commentary i understood the actual meaning. Hare Krishna!!
*you 'misunderstood' my recent response.
sorry writing mistake.
Yes , its well known that Srila Prabhupada was generally following Srila Cakravarti Thakur.
Sorry prabhuji, im not qualified to comment on commentaries of great vaisnavas.
Bg 11.52
su-durdarśam idaṁ rūpaṁ
dṛṣṭavān asi yan mama
devā apy asya rūpasya
nityaṁ darśana-kāṅkṣiṇaḥ
Hare Krsna Prabhuji,
PAMHO.
If all the commentaries said the same thing, then why would Srila Prabhupada have to burn the midnight oil to write another one and then struggle to get it published?
You have to choose one path, one guru and start to follow him prabhu. You decide which path appeals to you, whihc guru appeals to you. Like this, you are simply looking at the pebbles on the sea shore, you are not attempting to dive deep into the sea to get the pearls waiting to be picked up.
We do not face these confusions - because we do not read anything apart from Srila Prahupada. If we read all he has written and understand and imbibe, that is enough for all lifetimes.
This is my limited understanding.
Haribol,
YOur servant,
Radha Rasamayi DD
yes you are right mataji. thank you.
hare krishna !!