Madhvacarya and Ramanujacarya

Hare Krishna.

Please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to Srila Prabhupada.

Both Madhvacarya and Ramanujacarya are considered bonafide Vaishnava acaryas but then why did they teach Narayan or Vishnu is source of all incarnation and not Krishna which is not supported by bhagavatam.

your sevant


You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!

Join ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT

Email me when people reply –


  • Volunteer

    Hare Krishna Prabhuji. Dandavat Pranam. All glories to Srila Prabhupada

    There is no difference between Vishnu, Narayana and Krishna. These three are name of a single personality. Different sampradaya give emphasis on a specific form as supreme due to their attachment to that particular form. This confusion should be removed first. Ram-sita, Laxmi-Narayana, Radha-Krishna all are different aspect of same Vishnu/Narayana/Krishna.

    your aspiring Servant

    Hari Bol

  • Volunteer

    It is as like for each mother her own child is the best one. 

    They are in Shri Sampradaya. For Mother Lakshmi Her dear Husband Narayana is Supreme because of that She glorifies Him as the Supreme and Her followers also does so in the mood of servitership. Servant and Master rasa.

    But Mother Lakshmi Herself seeing Rasa dance desired to enter that place but was not allowed. It shows that Krishna is higher than Narayana although He is the same Narayana. Shrimati Radharani could enter to Rasa dance but not Mother Lakshmi and it shows that Shrimati Radharani is greater than Mother Lakshmi. 

    When Lord Shri Krishna takes form of Lord Narayana Shrimati Radharani takes form of Mother Lakshmi.

    Your servant, 

This reply was deleted.