Is Dowry Justified?

Hare Krishna to all Devotees,

 

All Glories to Srila Prabhupada

Please forgive if my question is inappropriate. I was curious to know:

1. Is Dowry Justified?

2. If yes, to what extent?

3. Is it recommended in the vedas and the shastras?

Hare Krishna! Radhe Radhe!

Your insignificant servant,

shalabh

You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!

Join ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Volunteer

    Hare Krishna dandvats Mataji, PAMHO, AGTSP, Regarding dowry lets see what Srimad Bhagavatam is quoting as per Canto 3 Chapter 22 Text 23, Svayambhuva Manu when he married his daughter Devahuti to Kardambh Muni 

    Śrīmad Bhāgavatam 3.22.23

    śatarūpā mahā-rājñī

    pāribarhān mahā-dhanān

    dampatyoḥ paryadāt prītyā

    bhūṣā-vāsaḥ paricchadān

    SYNONYMS

    śatarūpā — Empress Śatarūpā; mahā-rājñī — the Empress; pāribarhān — dowry; mahā-dhanān — valuable presents; dam-patyoḥto the bride and bridegroom; paryadāt — gave; prītyā — out of affection; bhūṣā — ornaments; vāsaḥ — clothes; paricchadān — articles for household use.

    TRANSLATION

    Empress Śatarūpā lovingly gave most valuable presents, suitable for the occasion, such as jewelry, clothes and household articles, in dowry to the bride and bridegroom.

    PURPORT

    The custom of giving one's daughter in charity with a dowry is still current in India. The gifts are given according to the position of the father of the bride. Pāribarhān mahā-dhanān means the dowry which must be awarded to the bridegroom at the time of marriage. Here mahā-dhanān means greatly valuable gifts befitting the dowry of an empress. The words bhūṣā-vāsaḥ paricchadān also appear here. Bhūṣā means "ornaments," vāsaḥ means "clothing," and paricchadān means "various household articles." All things befitting the marriage ceremony of an emperor's daughter were awarded to Kardama Muni, who was until now observing celibacy as a brahmacārī. The bride, Devahūti, was very richly dressed with ornaments and clothing.

    In this way Kardama Muni was married with full opulence to a qualified wife and was endowed with the necessary paraphernalia for household life. In the Vedic way of marriage such a dowry is still given to the bridegroom by the father of the bride; even in poverty-stricken India there are marriages where hundreds and thousands of rupees are spent for a dowry. The dowry system is not illegal, as some have tried to prove. The dowry is a gift given to the daughter by the father to show good will, and it is compulsory. In rare cases where the father is completely unable to give a dowry, it is enjoined that he must at least give a fruit and a flower. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, God can also be pleased even by a fruit and a flower. When there is financial inability and no question of accumulating a dowry by another means, one can give a fruit and flower for the satisfaction of the bridegroom.

    Trust this clarifies your issues, Hare Krishna.


    • Hare Krishna Prabhuji, AGTSP!

      Thank you Prabhuji, for the enlightening verse; it was quite reasonable a practice...and it really hurts to now that  people practice dowry even today and oppose inter-caste marriages, like what used to happen in older times/yugas. Well, this is what Kali-Yuga all about. We must all chant the Maha-mantra to purify our minds and thoughts.

      Radhe Radhe

      Your insignificant servant,

This reply was deleted.