Hare Krsna
At one point in time I want someone to love me. Once I let go of that expectation I am free. How to choose between love and freedom?
Hari bol
You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Hare Krsna
At one point in time I want someone to love me. Once I let go of that expectation I am free. How to choose between love and freedom?
Hari bol
You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!
Replies
Love and attachment are different words and having different meanings.
Love is when you need nothing and you are ready to give to anyone anything.. and serve others.
Attachement is when we are lacking something in ourselves so we are seeking to fulfill that void in ourselves by seeking and begging others to fulfill us. ( IT SEEMS.. Well I am no expert).
I am still seeker. I am still begging stage only. :-)
I wish I was a rich in love so that I can donate love freely to all birds bees animals and plants humans etc .. But I m not full in myself what can i serve others.
Krishna is full in love itseems and He is overflowing in love ..When He enters our life then life has a life in it. Till then life is meaningless and purposeless.
Please come into my heart Krishna.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Z_za8hi0Sy8
I wasn't discussing attachment. I knoŵ what attachment (moha) is. I am talking about becoming free. Free and independent like Krsna. But, I guess the only thing holding us back is attachment only and not love. Thank you
We can be free like Krishna only when we can become like Krishna. That is contended with whatever we have.
contentment comes when we are are full and there is no necessity for running after something for filling the void.
Krishna is full.... He doesn't need anything or anyone making HIM full or complete.
:-)
Yes, fully content, filled with truth and bliss.
Exception is Only Shrimati Radharani. :-)
Arey oo Radha tere bina toh shyam hai adha
It is not that Rādhārāṇī is separate from Kṛṣṇa. Rādhārāṇī is also Kṛṣṇa, for there is no difference between the energy and the energetic. Without energy, there is no meaning to the energetic, and without the energetic, there is no energy. Similarly, without Rādhā there is no meaning to Kṛṣṇa, and without Kṛṣṇa, there is no meaning to Rādhā. Because of this, the Vaiṣṇava philosophy first of all pays obeisances to and worships the internal pleasure potency of the Supreme Lord. Thus the Lord and His potency are always referred to as Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa. Similarly, those who worship the name of Nārāyaṇa first of all utter the name of Lakṣmī, as Lakṣmī-Nārāyaṇa. Similarly, those who worship Lord Rāma first of all utter the name of Sītā. In any case—Sītā-Rāma, Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa, Lakṣmī-Nārāyaṇa—the potency always comes first. ( TLC )