Gender
Male
"I never critisized him for marrying a young girl. It was the most normal thing for his time and times before him. Also, just because kunti devi or someone from ancient married at young age won't mean we should also do that right? Unless someone…"
"Why would I want to marry a young girl lol. I don't practice any outdated and un-practical vedic practices. Also I need to be a pure devotee for what?"
"Bruh are you insulting Krishna by trying to defend Prabhupada?"
""But my main doubt is that the first child of prabhupad was when his wife was at the of 14 years so I feel bit a weird because 14 years is less for giving birth to a child."
Hinduism is the only religion that can adapt to modern morals and values.…"
Hinduism is the only religion that can adapt to modern morals and values.…"
"Krishna lifted Govardhana, can Prabhupada?"
"Not familiar with the term dasanami.
Dasanami order was established by Adi-Shankaracharya. Whoever belongs to the dasanami order, belongs to his parampara.
Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu accepted Harinam initiation from Ishvarapuri.
It was only the mantra…"
Dasanami order was established by Adi-Shankaracharya. Whoever belongs to the dasanami order, belongs to his parampara.
Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu accepted Harinam initiation from Ishvarapuri.
It was only the mantra…"
"Lord Sri Chaitanya mahaprabhu's goal was not to defeat Advaitavada.
But then, why did he accept the dasanami lineage?
Lord Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu's goal was not to defeat Advaitavada.
Then why did he accept the commentaries of Sridhara Svami? His…"
But then, why did he accept the dasanami lineage?
Lord Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu's goal was not to defeat Advaitavada.
Then why did he accept the commentaries of Sridhara Svami? His…"
if I am not wrong, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu was known as "Swami Krsnachaitanya Bharati" and he took initiation under Swami Keshava Bharati, who was a dasanami sannyasa (Shankaracharya Parampara). So does ISKCON also come under the dasanami…
"How can we reject ablsolute advaita ?
How can we? when almost everywhere in the vedas absolute advaita is accepted
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, Shukla Yajur veda 1.4.10 Says:
brahma vā idamagra āsīt, tadātmānamevāvet, aham brahmāsmīti |…"
How can we? when almost everywhere in the vedas absolute advaita is accepted
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, Shukla Yajur veda 1.4.10 Says:
brahma vā idamagra āsīt, tadātmānamevāvet, aham brahmāsmīti |…"
"Note: I am neither an advaitin nor a vaishnava. But I do not reject the concept of Advaita and even Dvaita. Everything is true, but they are on different scales and levels is what i believe."
"What is wrong with saying that jivatma and Paramatma are the same? They are ultimately one. The distinction between the jivatma and Paramatma is present only from the empirical point of view, but not from the absolute level, as there is only Brahman…"
"What is the strong reason behind mentioning "parts and parcels" when there is no such mention?
I've read the commentary of Sri Madhavacharya also. he explained that the realization of the Supreme Self as the pervasive and supportive reality leads to…"
I've read the commentary of Sri Madhavacharya also. he explained that the realization of the Supreme Self as the pervasive and supportive reality leads to…"
So there is an incorrect translation I found in the Isopanishad, which was translated by Srila Prabhupadaji.Verse 6, Sri Isopanishad:yas tu sarvāṇi bhūtānyātmany evānupaśyatisarva-bhūteṣu cātmānaṁtato na vijugupsateHis translation: He who…
Comments
Good Day,
How is everything with you, I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and deemed it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very vital to disclose to you, but I found it difficult to express myself here, since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on:(mrsstellaabudheir@gmail.com ) for the full details.
Have a nice day
Thanks God bless.
Stella.