A lot of people have by now heard of Dr. Zakir Naik, and how he is working to convince as many people as possible by his arguments, or his use of his translations of Vedic texts, to become Muslims. And those who are not educated in their own culture, such as simple minded Hindus who have not really
studied their own texts, become enamored by what he says. However, those who knowledgeable of those Vedic texts that Naik seems to use so well, they
become frustrated that so many people take his mistranslations seriously.

And that is what they are, they are often ridiculous mistranslations of Vedic texts used in a way to say Allah or Mohammed was predicted in the Vedic literature, or worse, that Kalki is actually Mohammed, so all Hindus should give  up their faith and simply become Muslims. But you have to be educated to discern his frequent untruths to perceive how cunning he is and also how stupid he is in the way he misuses the Vedic texts to trick Hindus.
But there is a reason for this, and apparently he is not as smart as he wants people  to think he is, as explained below:

Hari Om,
Stephen Knapp
Dr Zakir Naik's Fraud Exposed in Misusing Vedic Texts
by  Agniveer
January 2010

While I have always been critical of his  approach and conclusions, I always admired Dr Zakir Naik's sincerity and loyalty  to Muslims. I was impressed
by his gigantic efforts in studying thousands of  pages of scriptures and selecting verses that could be used to derive whatever  crazy interpretations he has derived to prove Muhammad in all world scriptures.I always used to wonder how he could gain all the time and energy to do so despite such a busy schedule of lecturing world around!

But suddenly I  came across a book "Muhammad in World Scriptures" by Maulana Abdul Haque  Vidyarthi written in 1936. And I was shocked to find that Dr
Zakir Naik has done  NOTHING MORE THAN simply copying-pasting from this book, mostly word-to-word and  cooked up his own 'original' research which he uses to claim that he is an  expert in 'Comparative Religion'. This is blatant plagiarization! And that too  from a source that his followers consider worse than Kafirs.

So all Dr  Zakir Naik has done is copying from works of another person,memorizing those  and claiming all the fame for himself! And he did this so writer or how he has  backstabbed his followers in the process.Because Maulana Adbul Haque  Vidyarthi was not an ordinary Muslim.

On contrary, he belonged to a cult  which almost the entire Muslim world,and especially the sects which believe in  ideology of Dr Zakir Naik considers as non-Muslim. They are in fact banned in  Pakistan and many other countries. Ask any Muslim scholar, and he would start  hurling abuses on them for disgracing Islam and Muhammad.Yes, I am referring  to the Ahmadiyya or Qadiyani cult. Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi was a disciple  of its founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed who is considered worse than a Kafir by all  Muslims who are fan of Dr Zakir Naik.

The reasons why Muslims hate  Ahmadiyyas and refuse to consider them as Muslims are because they hold certain  beliefs that no Muslim and follower of Dr Zakir Naik would dare to agree. Some  are as follows:

 a. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed was a Prophet  or Messenger,and this is 'shirk' - unpardonable sin as per Muslims
 b.  Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed continued to receive new revelations
 c. Ahmadiyyas believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmed to be a Messiah
 d.  Ahmadiyyas believe that Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Ashoka and Guru Nanak were also  Prophets e. Ahmadiyyas believe that Kalki Avatar would also be the final  Prophet and most importantly, the founder of Ahmadiyya cult had hurled abuses  and even cursed to Hell those who refused to believe in his prophethood!

The concept of Avatar is a 'shirk' as per Islam. All Islamic  Madarsa teach books of Maulvi Md Ismail which specifically states that anyone  believing in Avatars or further Prophets or Avatars as Prophets is doing  'shirk'. Dr Zakir Naik knows all this - that is why in FAQ on Hinduism, he  refused to accept that Vedas can be revelations.

But he forgot that the material he has used to write other articles are directly lifted from Maulana Abdul Haque's writings who agrees that Vedas are revelations. Thus proving Prophet in Vedas or Bhavishya Puran is fine with Ahmadiyyas because that is how they justify prophethood of Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad  also. But for all other Muslims, on whose faith popularity of Dr Zakir Naik rests, this is 'shirk'.While these writings do not affect Hindus or even  Buddhists, Christians etc much, they definitely backstab a devout Muslim.

In summary, Dr Zakir Naik is guilty of :

a. Copying directly, even  word to word, from works of Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi, an Ahmadiyya without  even quoting his references
b. Using his own name instead to falsely proclaim  that he is expert on comparative religion
c. Cheating with other Muslims who  consider Ahmadiyya and their beliefs to be worse than those of Kafirs
d. Backstabbing his blind followers who quote his works without realizing that Dr  Zakir Naik has made them a sacrificial goat at mercy of Qadianis/       hmadiyyas.
e. Trying to prove Vedas and Puran contain revelations of  Muhammad but also refusing to clear admit Vedas as revelations. Thus he has  deliberately not
made clear whether in reality Dr Zakir Naik is a Qadiyani or  not.

It seems obvious that Dr Zakir Naik is actually a Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya in disguise trying to fool common Muslims. But why does he need to put this disguise? is it because Ahmadiyyas are persecuted in all Muslim countries? Or is it that he is a spy with some other hidden agenda. Or perhaps, the way he claims  to have discovered new researches in Quran that even Allah, Muhammad, Ali et al  could not discover, he is laying foundation of his own Prophethood!

Only Dr Zakir Naik knows what is the real truth and what is his true mission. But his backstabbing has left his blind followers nowhere. Either they will have to admit to Ahmadiyya beliefs, which is the complete foundation of his  writings and 'research' or regret their faith in Dr Zakir Naik being a Muslim.
And as per Islamic Criminal Law, that Dr Zakir Naik is such a great  fan of, he himself can decide what should be the most appropriate punishment for him. Sharia says that a thief's hands should be chopped off. Hadiths say that  one who deserts his faith or community should be killed. This is time to test  how sincere are Dr Zakir Naik and Muslims who have followed him so far, to the  teachings of their own divine texts
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!

Join ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT


  • Hare Krishna to everyone,

    Dandavat pranam

    I am just writing this to make people aware that Dr. Zakir Naik also mis-represents some aspects of the Bhagavat Gita and Krishna. Here is a link where he speaks things that are not sanctioned by Sanathana dharma.

    The point of posting this reply is just to create awareness and drive through a point that "When we hear and see about all these issues, we should remind ourselves and others that the only solution for such problems is to preach enthusiastically the teachings of Srila Prabhupada and thus convey the pure message of GOD to everyone.'

    Thank you,

    ys chaitanya

This reply was deleted.