A
Ray of Vishnu
On the fifth day of the dark lunar fortnight of the month of
Govinda [corresponding to February 6th, 1874 A.D. by the western
calendar], at 3:30 in the afternoon, Bimala Prasad Datta, later to
be known as Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura, made his
appearance in Purusottama Ksetra [Jagannatha Puri] in the state of
Orissa, not far from the temple of Lord Jagannatha. He was the
fourth son of Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura and Sriyukta Bhagavati
Devi, and at the time of his birth all thirty-two bodily symptoms
of a maha-purusa, a great personality, were pointed out by an
experienced astrologer. Furthermore, the boy was born with his
umbilical cord wrapped around his neck like a Brahmin’s thread. The
astrologer commented at his birth, “I have done many horoscopes in
my life, but I have never before seen such a horoscope filled with
all the signs of a great personality. This child will become world
famous as a brilliant teacher of life’s ultimate goal.”
When the child was six months old, Lord Jagannatha’s
Rathayatra Festival was in procession, and the cart stopped in
front of Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura’s house for three days.
Following the instructions of Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, Bhagavati
Devi brought the child before the cart and an offered garland fell
from the neck of the Lord, encircling the boy. This was taken as a
sign of special favor by all present. The grain ceremony was
observed on the cart at this time and was done with Jagannatha
prasada. When the boy’s vocational inclination was tested, he
immediately embraced the Srimad-Bhagavatam, indicating his future
as a preacher. Therefore, from the very beginning of his
appearance, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura exhibited all
the signs of an exalted, eternal associate of the Lord, who had
descended in answer to Srila Bhaktivinoda’s prayer for a “ray of
Visnu” to help him spread the Krsna Consciousness Movement.
Although family lineage may be ultimately irrelevant when
considering the appearance of an eternally liberated associate of
the Lord, still it is interesting to see what sort of family is
blessed with such a transcendental personality. As history shows
us, Lord Brahma himself appeared in the family of Muslims as Srila
Haridasa Thakura, and there are other instances of exalted persons
taking birth in humble families. Still, as a point of interest, we
may hear something of the lineage of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta
Sarasvati Thakura.
His family line traces back to Lord Brahma from the
descendants of Chitragupta, and they are known as the Brahma
kayasthas. Bharata is in the 87th generation from Chitragupta,
Bharadvaja is the 88th. After him came Angira, and after him
appeared Brhaspati. In the 149th generation of descendants,
Purusottama, son of Sivadatta, went to Bengal upon the summons of
the King of Bengal, Adisura. Purusottama’s youngest son took
sannyasa and became famous as Kanaka Dandi. In the 7th and 8th
generations of Purusottama’s family Binayaka and his son Narayana
Datta both did ministerial work for the king of Bengal. In the 15th
generation from Purusottama, Raja Krsnananda, the king of Kheturi
(in Bengal), and the father of Srila Narottama dasa Thakura, the
great Vaisnava acarya, appeared. Raja Krsnananda was also a great
devotee and was personally favored by Lord Nityananda Prabhu. The
7th generation from Raja Krsnananda saw the appearance of
Madanamohana Datta, who was very famous in Bengal and Calcutta for
his spiritual qualities. His great-grandson was Anandachandra
Datta, and his son was Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, whose 4th son
was Bimala Prasad. The name Bimala or Shri Bimala Devi refers to
the para sakti (internal potency) of Lord Jagannatha, so his name
literally means the mercy of the internal potency of the
Lord.
Bimala Prasad stayed in Jagannatha Puri for ten months after
his appearance and then journeyed to Bengal by palanquin on his
mother’s lap. He grew up in his early years in Ranaghata in the
District of Nadia, hearing about Krsna from his mother. When he was
a small boy, perhaps two or three years old, Srila Bhaktivinoda
Thakura brought some ripe mangoes from the market. Bimala Prasad
took one to eat, saying, “This is mine.” Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura
got up and said in a grave voice, “What is this? New fruit has come
into the house. It has not been offered to Giridhari and you have
taken it first? Remember, new fruit is to be given first to the
Lord. Without giving the first share to the Lord, nothing is to be
taken.”
The child was very repentant and exclaimed, “Oh, what evil
thoughts I have had! Throughout my whole life I shall not eat these
again. This is the right punishment for one ruled by greed.” He
made the promise and observed it throughout his whole life. His
Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada comments on this
incident: “Whenever we offered him mango he said, ‘No, I am an
offender. I cannot take mango.’ He was thinking that I have
offended [Krsna] in my childhood by taking the mango of the Deity.
So this is the characteristic of the acarya. They teach by their
life’s action-one should be so much determined. A child took the
mango, there is no offense, but he took that vow.”
Education
When Bimala Prasad was seven years old, Srila Bhaktivinoda
Thakura was constructing the Bhakti Bhavan in Calcutta at
Ramabagana. During that construction, a Deity of Lord Kurma was
unearthed. Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura ordered his son to begin
regulated worship of that Deity.
From the very beginning the boy used to hear the preaching of
his father with rapt attention. Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, as well
as his audience, were amazed to see how a small boy could hear the
topics of Krsna consciousness with such total absorption. By the
age of seven he had committed the entire Bhagavad-gita to memory
and could wonderfully explain the verses as well. Later on he was
trained in publishing and proof-reading at Srila Bhaktivinoda
Thakura’s printing press in connection with the Thakura’s
well-known spiritual journal the Sajjana-Tosani. At the age of
eleven, Bimala Prasad toured the various places of Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu’s lilas with his father.
Bimala Prasad had an eidetic memory. Whatever he would read
once he could later recall with perfect clarity. He was trained in
mathematics and astrology at the Sri Ramapura School, and he
achieved such astounding scholarship that he was eventually awarded
the title Siddhanta Sarasvati by his tutors, Pandit Mahesh Chandra
Chauramani and Pandit Sundar Lal.
During this period he used to attend the Sunday weekly
meetings of Thakura Bhaktivinoda’s Visva-vaisnava-raja-sabha and
hear the Thakura lecture on the Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu of Srila
Rupa Gosvami. He was never known to study his school assignments,
and while sitting at home, would replace those assignments with
studies of Srila Narottama dasa Thakura’s Prarthana,
Premabhakti-candrika and other devotional literatures. However,
whatever questions he was asked by his teachers, he would
immediately answer, and he got excellent results on all of his
examinations.
He used to debate everyone he met on all sorts of subjects. No
one who argued with him was ever able to defeat him. Just as Sri
Caitanya Mahaprabhu had defeated a great scholar, Kesava Kasmiri at
a young age, so similarly Bimala Prasad once, during his later
college days, debated a scholar named Panchanana Sahityacharya, the
disciple of Vasudeva Sastri, a very famous professor of that time
on topics of astrological calculation. The debate was held in the
home of Sri Rajendra Chandra Sastri and judged by him as well.
After some discussion that scholar had to accept defeat. In fact,
the scholar became so mortified that he could not check the calls
of nature. After that, everyone was reluctant to debate him for
fear of being defeated.
At the age of eleven, while in the fifth class, Bimala Prasad
invented a type of short-hand writing called Bicanto, and it was
during this period that he took a tour of the holy places with his
father.
When the boy was in 7th class (equivalent to today’s eighth
class), and about 13 years old, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura brought
tulasi beads for his son from Jagannatha Puri and gave him the name
of Hari and a Nrsimha mantra to chant which he executed very
faithfully, along with the worship of his Kurma Deity, according to
the instructions of Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura.
At the age of sixteen, while his schooling continued, the
books of Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura formed the serious content of
his studies. He also began writing books on astrology, and during
this time he formed the Cirakumara Sabha or the August Assembly
amongst his friends with whom he met regularly at Calcutta’s Beadon
Square. There they used to discuss topics related to religion, and
the members were required to take a vow of celibacy. The Society
was formed with the purpose of giving people a chance to remain
seriously engaged in worship of the Lord and detached from family
life. But Bimala Prasad was the only one who observed his vows
immaculately.
In 1892, at the age of eighteen, he took an entrance
examination and entered Calcutta’s Sanskrit College. As before, he
paid scant attention to the prescribed books, but he found the time
to read all of the philosophical books contained in the
library.
During his college holidays he would discuss the Vedas with
the scholar Sriyukta Prithvidhara Sharma. Although Siddhanta
Sarasvati had become learned in all six branches of Vedic
knowledge: siksa (pronunciation), kalpa (sequences of Vedic
sacrifice), vyakarana (grammar, especially the use of word roots,
inflected words and sentences), nirukta (meanings of inflected
words and word roots), chandah (recitation of Vedic mantras) and
jyotisa (astrological and astronomical calculation), still to study
the vyakarana, the grammatical branch of the Vedas, he approached
the Pandit Prithvidhara Sharma. The Pandit praised him for his
achievements and encouraged him to study the Siddhanta Kaumudi
throughout his life. Siddhanta Sarasvati replied, “My life is for
the single-minded cultivation of the teachings of Sri Caitanya, not
for the cultivation of grammar. I have only studied the Vedas, the
branches of the Vedas and their related parts in a secondary
manner.”
In 1895 he left the college, as he was very eager to execute
his worship of the Lord and to remain free from the pressure to
enter family life. He stated in his autobiography:
“If I remain studying with careful attention at the College,
then extreme pressure will be brought upon me to enter family life,
but if I am considered to be foolish and inefficient, then no one
will put such an inducement upon me for becoming so engaged. By
this consideration, I left the Sanskrit College, and, in order to
maintain my life for the service of Hari, I was desirous of getting
an honest occupation which I could perform with the intention of
earning a humble income.”
During his student days he also wrote essays on spiritual
topics for various magazines and strongly condemned various
religious malpractices which had become prominent in society. At
the Bhakti Bhavan in 1897 he established a catuspathi (a small
academy) called Saraswati Chatuspati where many learned persons
from Calcutta attended his lectures and discourses on astronomy. He
also published the magazines Jyotirvid and Brihaspati and other old
astrological texts like the Surya-siddhanta, a famous and highly
regarded Sanskrit astronomical treatise. Here he also established
and edited the Bhakti Panjika, an almanac. He was well-acquainted
with both the Eastern and Western branches of astrology, but
naturally favoredthe Vedic one. He was offered a chair in astronomy
at the University of Calcutta by Sir Asutosh Mukherjee, but
Siddhanta
Sarasvati declined it, thinking it an impediment to his
spiritual life. At the request of Srila Jagannatha dasa Babaji he
composed the Sri Navadvipa Panjika, a Krsna-ized almanac in which
the months, lunar fortnights, days, lunar days, stars, etc.were all
given names of Visnu. He did not spend very long in his
astronomical pursuits, however, and soon dedicated himself fully to
the worship and distribution of the teachings of Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu.
He was also employed by the royal kings of Tripura from 1895
to 1905 in various services. Initially he accepted the post of
editor, under Panchasrika Maharaja Virachandra Manikya Bahadur, and
he edited a history of their family entitled Raj Ratnakar. During
this time he studied all of the principal books in the Royal
Library. A year later, however, the Maharaja departed from this
world. The succeeding king, Maharaja Radhakisore Manikya Bahadur
entrusted Siddhanta Sarasvati with the instruction of the sons of
the king in Bengali and Sanskrit. The king also requested him to
put an end to various cheating activities of persons who were
misappropriating royal wealth. Siddhanta Sarasvati quickly stopped
this nonsense much to the delight of the king. He assisted the
royal family in different ways until 1905. At that time he
requested to be given leave, and this was granted along with a full
pension, which he accepted for some time and then later
discarded.
During this ten year period many other significant events took
place as well. In 1897 he began to strictly observe the vows of
Caturmasya, including the practice of cooking for himself one
preparation daily, taking the food from the ground and lying on the
earth without any bedding or pillow. In 1898 he toured Benares,
Prayaga, and Gaya with Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura and discussed
philosophy with persons in the line of Sri Ramanujacarya. In 1899,
Siddhanta Sarasvati published a number of articles on spiritual
topics in the magazine called Nivedana, a Calcutta weekly.
Initiation
Siddhanta Sarasvati had been engaged in regularly chanting the
maha-mantra and a Nrsimha mantra given to him by Srila Bhaktivinoda
Thakura when he was in the Seventh Class, and he had been
worshiping the Kurma Deity (discovered in laying the foundation of
the Bhakti Bhavan in Calcutta) since the age of seven. Without
fail, he had been executing that worship and chanting since his
boyhood, and from 1885 onward he had received special training in
printing, editing, etc. at the press at the Bhakti Bhavan.
Thus, the young man was a very qualified candidate for
becoming the disciple of a guru. Many pseudo-gurus
(mantra-peddlers) of the sahajiya category wanted to have him as
their disciple to increase their false prestige. After all,
Siddhanta Sarasvati was a magistrate’s son, he was a strict
renunciate from birth, he was learned and deeply attached to the
scriptures. But Siddhanta Sarasvati was not interested in such
pretenders.
In 1898, after Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura had constructed his
residence in Navadvipa Dhama at Godruma Dvipa and called it
Svananda-sukhada-kunja, and sometime after the discovery of Lord
Caitanya’s birth site by the Thakura and Srila Jagannatha dasa
Babaji, Srila Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji Maharaja arrived in
Navadvipa Dhama to see the site of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu’s birth
and to hear the discourses of Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura. When he
arrived, he was singing in ecstasy. His only possessions were the
tulasi mala which he wore around his neck and another set he kept
in his hand for counting. He kept a
few books, such as Narottama dasa Thakura’s works: Prarthana
and Prema-bhakti-candrika.
Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji had been performing bhajana for many
years in Vrndavana. He was extremely renounced and was the disciple
of Bhagavata dasa Babaji, the disciple of Jagannatha dasa Babaji.
He was not well-educated and had been a grain-merchant in his
previous existence, but it was widely known that he was a liberated
paramahamsa of the highest caliber in the area of
Vraja-mandala.
At the time of his arrival, he was wearing a cap made of tiger
skin and was carrying a basket of various items and materials for
his service. He spotted Siddhanta Sarasvati and offered him four or
five pieces of knotted rope for chanting rounds, a tilaka stamp
with the initials for Hare Krsna, the tiger skin cap and
paraphernalia for worship. Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji Maharaja had
received the basket and cap from his spiritual master, Bhagavata
dasa Babaji. Siddhanta Sarasvati was very attracted to Gaura Kisora
dasa Babaji’s lotus feet at first sight. He was later to comment
with great humility:
“I have been busy within this material world trying to bring
sense gratification within the grasp of my hand. I have often
thought that by obtaining the objects of sense gratification, all
my short-comings will be fulfilled. I often attained different
facets that were indeed very rare, but my own personal
short-comings were never mitigated. In this material world I have
had the association of very high-class, aristocratic persons.
However, seeing their various deficiencies, I could not offer them
praise. The most merciful Supreme Lord Sri Gaurasundara, seeing me
in such a lamentable condition at such a time of adversity, gave
permission to His two dearmost devotees Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura
and Srila Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji to grant their blessings to me.
Because I was always intoxicated with a worldly false ego, wanting
again and again self-appraisal, I deprived myself of my own real
benefit. But because of the influence of my previous births’
activities in devotional service, I came into the association of
Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, who was the form of my spiritual
well-wisher.
“My spiritual master [Srila Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji] would go
and visit Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, and many times would reside
with him. Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, out of his compassion for
other living entities, pointed out my spiritual master, Srila Gaura
Kisora dasa Babaji. Upon seeing my spiritual master, the extent of
my worldly false ego diminished. I knew that all the other living
entities who have taken the human form of life were also fallen and
low like myself. But by gradually observing the spiritual character
of my master, I realized that only a Vaisnava could reside in this
material world and be of exemplary character.”
At Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura’s urging, the young man
approached Srila Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji for initiation in the
month of Magh of the year 1900. Srila Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji
expressed reluctance to accept him, knowing Siddhanta Sarasvati to
be a great scholar. Finally, when Siddhanta Sarasvati pleaded with
him for initiation, Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji replied, “Mahaprabhu
will be asked. If He gives permission, your desire will be
fulfilled.” On another day Siddhanta Sarasvati approached him again
and asked, “What was Mahaprabhu’s order?” Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji
replied, “I forgot to ask.” The third time Babaji Maharaja was
requested, he replied, “I asked. I did not receive the command of
Mahaprabhu.” Siddhanta Sarasvati then stood up, his heart breaking,
and said, “You [Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and Srila Gaura Kisora] are
both worshippers of Krsna, the Crest Jewel of Debauchees, therefore
why will you take mercy on someone dedicated to ordinary morality
like me? In His pastimes as the exemplary teacher, Mahaprabhu has
given instructions on the worship of Krsna, the Crest Jewel of
Debauchees. Therefore, why will He give the command to take mercy
on me? But, karuna na haile kandiya kandiya prana na
rakhibe ara-If there is no mercy, weeping and weeping, I can
sustain my life no more. If I do not receive your mercy I do not
see any need in holding onto life.”
After thus indicating his readiness to take his life,
Siddhanta Sarasvati began to cry. Srila Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji’s
heart was melted to see this, so he told him to take bath in the
Sarasvati and then come back to him. At the time of initiation, he
gave Siddhanta Sarasvati the name: Sri Varsabhanavi-devi-dayita
dasa.
This pastime bears a striking resemblance to the relationship
between Narottama dasa Thakura and Lokanatha Gosvami-[Lokanatha
Gosvami was also an extremely humble and renounced paramahamsa who
was reluctant to take any disciples, considering himself
unqualified, but finally accepted Narottama dasa Thakura as his
only disciple.] It shows how eager and determined one must be for
the mercy of a pure devotee of Krsna.
In
Puri
In 1898 Siddhanta Sarasvati had accompanied his father to
Kasi, Prayaga and Gaya and had gathered many facts about all these
holy places, which were later incorporated into his commentary on
the Caitanya-caritamrta called Anubhasya. In 1900 he published a
book called Bange Samajikata, which described the origin, location
and philosophy of various societies, castes and religions, and he
expounded the clear superiority of Lord Caitanya’s doctrine of
inconceivable, simultaneous oneness and difference. In March he
accompanied Bhaktivinoda Thakura to Orissa where they visited the
temple of Ksira-cora-gopinatha at Remuna, and also saw Bhubaneswar
and Puri. While in Puri, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura decided to
build a place for bhajana just near the samadhi of Srila Haridasa
Thakura, and so Siddhanta Sarasvati stayed and served his father in
various ways, assisting him in establishing his Bhakti Kuti by the
sea.
At that time the Maharaja of Kasimbazar was camped nearby, and
he came regularly to hear from Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura and
Siddhanta Sarasvati. Siddhanta Sarasvati was giving regular classes
from the Caitanya-caritamrta in the presence of his father, and
many listeners were assembling just to hear it. The famous
Radharamanacarana Dasa Babaji used to come at that time to hear the
discourses.
Later relations with the Babaji
were broken because of two deviations by him:
1. He introduced the
chanting of Bhaja Nitai Gaura Radhe Syama Japa Hare Krsna Hare
Rama. This was introduced with the idea of stopping the audible
chanting of the maha-mantra. The first problem with this was that
the concocted mantra had the faults of siddhanta-virodha-an
opposing conclusion and rasabhasa-conflicting rasas. The second
problem was that trying to suppress the audible vibration of the
maha-mantra was against the desire of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, as
established by His activities and teaching, as well as by the
teachings of the Gosvamis. Rupa Gosvami had written in the Prathama
Caitanyastaka, text five: hare krsnty ucchaih-”Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu chants the Hare Krsna mantra in a loud voice …”
Therefore, Rupa Gosvami, an eyewitness to the activities of Sri
Caitanya Mahaprabhu and recipient of His full blessings and
empowerment for establishing His mission, personally testifies here
that Lord Caitanya did not confine the maha-mantra to inaudible
muttering, but loudly proclaimed it to all.
2. Radharamanacarana
Dasa Babaji also introduced the Sakhibheki doctrine by dressing his
follower Sri Jayagopala Bhattacarya as Lalita Sakhi. This was
against Mahaprabhu’s teaching as well, as an ordinary jiva was
being worshipped as though he were an expansion of Srimati
Radharani. Both Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura and Siddhanta Sarasvati
instructed the Babaji to give up these fallacious practices, but he
refused. Siddhanta Sarasvati began to preach publicly and strongly
against these misconceived teachings, proclaiming that the
maha-mantra is for both japa and kirtana, and that kirtana is
ultimately superior to japa. This created quite a controversy in
Puri with many taking the side of the Babaji out of misplaced
sentiment and others siding with Siddhanta Sarasvati.
During this period Siddhanta Sarasvati was engaged in the
compilation of a Vaisnava encyclopedia which contained an
explanation of Vaisnava terminology, brief biographies of great
Vaisnavas, an introduction to the books of the Vaisnava acaryas, a
description of the Vaisnava tirthas, the various conclusions of
Vaisnava sects. etc. He called it Vaisnava-Manjusa-Samahriti, and
it was later published in four volumes. A Vaisnava scholar
commented on it by saying, “This work is only possible for a
supra-mortal, a great personality like Prabhupada Srila Sarasvati
Thakura. Even if 25 to 30 scholars and 10 to 15 men taking the
treasury of a king began the work, they would be unable to edit
it.” The work of compilation was begun in Puri and continued as
Siddhanta Sarasvati made his preaching rounds of Sri Mayapur-dhama,
Sri Jagannatha Puri-dhama and Sri Vraja-dhama. He also studied the
books of Srila Madhvacarya and Srila Ramanujacarya and published
some of them in Bengali. He also published biographies of these and
other Vaisnava saints in the Sajjana-Tosani magazine of Srila
Bhaktivinoda Thakura.
He toured South India in 1904 and again in 1905-places like
Tirupati, Srirangam, Singhachal, Raj Mahendry, Madras, Perambadur,
Conjeveram, Kumbhakonam and Madurai. While on tour he collected all
the information about the rites and rules of Vedic tridanda
Vaisnava sannyasa from a Ramanuja tridandi swami at Perambadur.
Wherever he would go in his travels he would lecture, write and
debate the learned panditas of the day. He soon acquired such a
reputation that his name would strike fear in the hearts of his
philosophical adversaries. All bogus cults and sects were doomed in
his presence.
However, in Puri, Siddhanta Sarasvati experienced such severe
oppression and censure due to his preaching against the rhyming
kirtana and sakhibheki doctrine of the popular Radharamanacarana
Dasa Babaji that finally Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura instructed him
to go and perform bhajana near the Yogapitha, the birthsite of Sri
Caitanya Mahaprabhu.
Nama-Bhajana
In 1905, at the age of 31, he began his great vow, following
the example of Namacarya Haridasa Thakura, of chanting three lakhs
of names (192 rounds) per day. He determined that at the rate of
300,000 names daily, it would take about 9 years to complete one
billion names. He resided in a grass hut at the Yogapitha for four
years, and in February of 1909 he built a cottage near the
Yogapitha at Vrajapattana (town of Vraja) on the site of the house
of Sri Candrasekhara Acarya, the uncle of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu.
This place is considered to be non-different from the banks of
Radhakunda. There he remained,
uninterruptedly executing his chanting. He strictly followed
his vow and observed Caturmasya, cooking rice (which had been dried
in the sun) in ghee and eating it from the floor in the manner of a
cow. He would take rest lying on the ground, never using any
pillows and constantly chant and study the scriptures. Seeing his
renunciation, his Gurudeva, Srila Gaura Kisora Dasa Babaji Maharaja
said, “I observe that the renunciation of Sri Rupa-Raghunatha is
manifest in my Prabhu.” He used to address his disciple as “my
Prabhu.”
In commenting on this period Srila Prabhupada states, “From
childhood he was a strict brahmacari, Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati
Gosvami Maharaja. And he underwent very severe penances for
starting this movement: world-wide movement. That was his
mission.”
When the roof of his kutir became broken, rather than take
time away from his chanting, he would simply use an umbrella when
it rained and go on chanting. Sometimes, he had to go to different
places, but he continued very strictly and completed his vows
always.
In 1906 Sri Rohinikumara Ghosh, (the nephew of Chandramadhava
Ghosh Mahasaya, a former justice of the Calcutta High Court), had a
wonderful dream, and as a result approached Siddhanta Sarasvati for
initiation. The boy had gone to stay with some Bauls, a so-called
guru and his consort who he was instructed to address as “Mother”
and “Father”. These persons were actually sinful rascals in the
guise of devotees, but while he was in Mayapur, he had the good
fortune to hear from Siddhanta Sarasvati for a long time. He
returned to the place of the Baul, and feeling ill, he lay down to
rest. In a dream, the Baul took the form of a tiger and the
consort, the form of a tigress. They were about to devour the
unfortunate lad who was trying his best to take shelter of Lord
Gaurasundara. At that moment Siddhanta Sarasvati arrived on the
scene, chased the tigers away, and began to lead him to Mayapur.
The boy awoke at daybreak and proceeded to Mayapur where he heard
discourses from Siddhanta Sarasvati for several days. Finally, he
begged for initiation from his savior so feelingly that Siddhanta
Sarasvati took mercy on him.
Prior to this, Siddhanta Sarasvati had never given initiation
to anyone. His character was such that he never regarded his
disciples as his disciples, but he used to see them as being that
which was received from the lotus feet of his guru. He used to
address them as “Prabhu.” In his address to the Gaudiya Math’s
first Vyasa-puja, he has addressed his disciples as, “My friends,
rescuers from danger.” He also wrote, “If a Vaisnava does not do
the work of a guru, then the spiritual Vaisnava lineage will stop.
Again, if he does the work of a guru, then he becomes a
non-Vaisnava. For if a guru thinks, ‘I am a guru.’ then the first
‘u’ letter in the word guru disappears (the word becomes ‘garu’ or
cow). A real guru does not make disciples and thus remains a guru.
Here we see Siddhanta Sarasvati giving a very strong warning about
entertaining the conception of overlordship or being the master of
anyone. His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
observed that when he offered obeisances to Bhaktisiddhanta
Sarasvati Thakura, he used to return, “Daso ’smi”: “I am your
servant.” And in a lecture in 1973 on the occasion of
Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura’s Disappearance Day observance,
Srila Prabhupada in the same ecstatic mood spoke, ‘Anyway, it is by
his grace I was forced to give up my family life, and he brought me
some way orother in preaching his gospel. So, this is a memorable
day. What he desired, I am trying a little bit and you are all
helping me, so I have to thank you more. You are actually
representatives of my Guru Maharaja, because you are helping me in
executing the order of my Guru Maharaja. Thank you very
much.”
In the course of Siddhanta Sarasvati’s travels throughout
India he became much pained at the erroneous teachings of many
pseudo sects and sahajiya groups. There arose in his heart a
burning desire to widely preach the true siddhanta according to the
desire of the Six Gosvamis and Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. Although
Srila Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji ordinarily never allowed anyone to
touch his feet, he had voluntarily placed his feet on the head of
Siddhanta Sarasvati and ordered him to preach extensively and
advised him, “… to preach the Absolute Truth and keep aside all
other works.” Siddhanta Sarasvati said of
this occasion: “On receiving just a touch of the lotus feet of
my Sri Gurudeva, I lost all sense of this external world. I do not
know whether any transcendental agent equal to him in greatness has
ever appeared in this world. How may those, who are busy with the
lust, anger, etc. of the world ever know him?”
The Gaura
Mantra
Later in 1911 a controversy surfaced, challenging that the
name Gaura in the Gayatri mantra chanted by Gaudiya Vaisnavas was
not an eternal name of Godhead, was not found in the original
Vedas, and that Lord Caitanya was not an incarnation of Godhead,
but rather, by His own admission, a devotee of God.
Although it is clearly established in the pages of
Caitanya-bhagavata and Caitanya-caritamrta that Lord Caitanya is
the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself, there were some persons
who did not believe that His position as an avatara was revealed in
the original Vedas. Of course one actual proof of Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu’s divinity was the darsanas He provided to a number of
exalted devotees during the maha-prakasa manifestations in the home
of Srivasa Thakura, to Lord Nityananda as a six-armed Visnu form,
as Sad-Bhuja to Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya, as Radha-Krsna to Srila
Ramananda Raya, and so on. These proofs along with many convincing
verses supplied by Krsna dasa Kaviraja and Vrndavana dasa Thakura
in their Caitanya-caritamrta and Caitanya-bhagavata, repectively,
were sufficient for reasonable men. But the more stubborn worldly
scholars and critics wanted proof from the original Vedas. The
smartas objected to the worship of the Deity form of Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu and claimed that the Gaura-mantra was not an eternal
Vedic mantra.
Siddhanta Sarasvati cited proof from the Sruti, particularly
from the Caitanyopanisad from the Atharva Veda:
sa hovaca: rahasyam te vadisyami,
jahnavi-tire navadvipe
golokakhye dhamni govindo dvibhujo
gaurah sarvatma
maha-puruso mahatma maha-yogi
trigunatitah sattva-rupo
bhaktim loke kasyatiti. Tad ete
sloka bhavanti
Brahma said: “I shall tell thee a secret! On the bank of the
Jahnavi, at Navadvipa, which is called Goloka Dhama, shall Govinda,
in a two armed form, as Gaura, the Great One, the Great Mystic, Who
is transcendental to the three modes of material nature, and Whose
form is eternal, reveal Bhakti to the world! There are a number of
verses in that regard.” [Text 5].
Other evidence was cited from the Svetasvatara Upanisad, as
well as the Smrti, Tantras, Puranas, and especially the
Srimad-Bhagavatam. Siddhanta Sarasvati addressed a large assembly
at Navadvipa’s Bada Akhada Hall, where many erudite scholars had
gathered, headed by Sri Madhusudana Gosvami Sarvabhauma. He
forcefully and brilliantly proved the eternality and glory of the
Name, Form, Attributes, etc. of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. Although
Siddhanta Sarasvati was unaware of it, Srila Gaura Kisora dasa
Babaji was there in one corner of the meeting, and when he heard
Siddhanta Sarasvati’s lecture he was
extremely pleased with him. All of the Gaudiya Vaisnavas who
heard the discourse were filled with bliss and began to chant
Siddhanta Sarasvati’s glories again and again. Due, in large
measure, to Siddhanta Sarasvati’s strong preaching on this point
throughout his life, the Deity form of Sri Caitanya. Mahaprabhu is
now worshipped and accepted all over India as the eternal form of
the Lord, and many thousands have received the Gaura mantra with
great faith and for eternal benefit.
His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta
Swami Prabhupada commented on Siddhanta Sarasvati’s strong
preaching against the caste gosvamis and smartas:
“My Guru Maharaja’s contribution is that he defeated the caste
gosvamis. He defeated this brahmanism. He did it the same way as
Caitanya Mahaprabhu did. As Caitanya Mahaprabhu said, kiba vipra,
kiba nyasi, sudra kene naya, yei krsna tattva-vetta, sei ‘guru’
haya: ‘There is no consideration whether one is a sannyasi, a
brahmana, a sudra, or a grhastha. No. Anyone who knows the science
of Krsna, he is all right, he is gosvami and he is brahmana.’
“This was my Guru Maharaja’s contribution. And for this
reason, he had to face so many vehement protests from these
brahmanas of the caste gosvamis.
“Once they conspired to kill him-my Guru Maharaja told me
personally. By his grace, when we used to meet alone he used to
talk about so many things. He was so kind that he used to talk with
me, and he personally told me that these people, ‘They wanted to
kill me.’
“They collected twenty-five thousand rupees and went to bribe
the police officer in charge of the area, saying, ‘You take these
twenty-five thousand rupees. We shall do something against
Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati, and you don’t take any steps.’ He could
understand that they wanted to kill him. So the police officer
frankly came to Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati: ‘Of course, we accept
bribes, and we indulge in such things, but not for a sadhu, not for
a saintly person. I cannot dare.’ So, the police officer refused
and said to my Guru Maharaja, ‘You take care. This is the
position.’ This was because he so vehemently protested.
“When my Guru Maharaja was present, even big, big scholars
were afraid to talk with even his beginning students. My Guru
Maharaja was called ‘living encyclopedia’. He could talk with
anyone on any subject, he was so learned. And no compromise.
So-called saints, avataras, yogis-everyone who was false was an
enemy to my Guru Maharaja. He never compromised. Some Godbrothers
complained that this preaching was a ‘chopping technique’ and it
would not be successful. But those who criticized him fell
down.”