Hare Krishna 

AGTSP 

PAMHO

I have some questions to ask

first of all

why do some people claim that the Vaishnava puranas are not authentic and the Vaishnava Upanishads are not veidic? Some even say that the puranas should only be accepted once they are accepted by the Vedas and therefore the Vaishnava puranas are not accurate 

also an unscrupulous person told me that narayana param Brahma tattvas narayana parah is the wrong translation of the Narayana suktam he told me that it is Narayana param-Brahmatattva Narayana parah 

And he uses this interopolation to say that Narayana is actually a lesser manifestation of Sri shiva…and he was actually a Rishi who became a Brahma tattva by his merit

listening to all this had made my mind feel very disturbed as for the past one year I have completely surrendered myself unto the transcendental service of Sri Krishna paramatma who I believe to be the supreme personality of godhead and the source to all the plenary portions of godhead

but right now I myself do not know what to do to right now because of all these unscrupulous commentaries by the Shaivas and the smartas

how do I deal with all this? 

Someone please be my Sri Krishna like bhagavan himself was to Arjuna, which in this case is clearly me.

 

Hare Krishna 

hari Bol 

You need to be a member of ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT to add comments!

Join ISKCON Desire Tree | IDT

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Sevak

    Hare Krsna

    why do some people claim that the Vaishnava puranas are not authentic and the Vaishnava Upanishads are not veidic?

    Due to ignorance or envy

    how do I deal with all this?

    Avoid such people. Chant Hare Krsna

    Only Sri Krsna is Sri Krsna for Arujna and also every and all living entities.

    No jiva can become Sri Krsna ever.  

    Hare Krsna

    • Hare Krishna 

      yes thank you so much for your reply 

      this is indeed very nice to hear 

      also I had another question 

      i heard from some evil and concoted shaivites that krishna was actually the medium for the speaking of the bhagavad gita, and shiva was the one who spoke through him. that is, they claim that shiva was the one who spoke gita! what a shame to our present sanatana dharma society that such lies are being presented to us.....this is a complete misconception and twisting of the reality in order to fit THEIR perceptions of what the shastra says! 

      nevertheless, can you please give me some ways to refute and ignore this unscrupulous statement? 

       

      hari bol 

      sai ramakrishnan

      • Sevak

        Hare

        i heard from some evil and concoted shaivites

        "evil" would be a very strong word and inappropriate.

        can you please give me some ways to refute and ignore this unscrupulous statement?

        There is no need to refute something that is to be ingored.

        There are so many advertisements for cosmetic products that promise change of skin color. If one goes about refuting them, there is no end to it.

        Those things that deserve refutation first should have some scriptural basis. I don't see any scriptural basis for such their statements. Hence we can simply ignore.

        Hare Krsna

      •  https://www.youtube.com/live/SMzogqrYnPY?si=opk6vkFH2HCDXcLR

        Hare Krishna prabhuji 

This reply was deleted.